On CBS MoneyWatch: Best Way to Retire Rich
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
AMD's slow performance
If AMD's dual core processors don't perform any better than the K6-2, Athlon, Thunderbird, Duron then don't even bother. They may be less expensive but the performance is dismal compared to an Intel chip. A Pentium II 333 would run circles around a K6-2 500, a Pentium III 850 will run circles around a Athlon 1Ghz., and a P4 will run circles around a Athlon XP. Sorry AMD..not impressed.
Posted by: teckk@...   Posted on: 06/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What Microsoft wants, Microsoft gets.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/04
Dual core has been around for a while!  B.O.F.H. | 06/15/04
Wishful thinking...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/04
You have a source better than Microsoft for when it will be released?  B.O.F.H. | 06/15/04
(NT)The article is not about $50,000 IBM/Sun boxes  toadlife | 06/15/04
AMD's slow performance  teckk@... | 06/14/04
(NT)You post this same disinformation everytime an AMD story pops up  toadlife | 06/14/04
Thanks for the reply's  teckk@... | 06/15/04
LOL  Suicida| | 06/14/04
What year are you in?  drichards1953 | 06/15/04
Whatever...  pearlie_z | 06/15/04
Wake Up  bobiroc | 06/15/04
Apple & AMD.....  middle of nowhere | 06/15/04
That is True  bobiroc | 06/15/04
AMD developed Hypertransport  micronot | 06/15/04
Huh?  TerryC_z | 07/30/04
Sweet!  savagesteve13 | 06/14/04
things could get interesting  zijiang | 06/15/04
Dual processor CPU is nothing new  cchamb2 | 02/24/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here