On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
Insane
I'm sure there are billion different better ways to spend a billion dollars. TV is not necessity. Seems silly to me.

But wait, who would want this? I mean besides those who are looking for handouts. I'm thinking Advertisers. If a good chunk of the poor population stopped being able to watch TV that's a huge chunk of Ad revenue that the TV stations don't get. Thier audience shrinks so do the ad revenue. Wanna bet they've been lobbying for this?
Posted by: voska   Posted on: 03/12/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

So we're spending almost a billion dollars to subsidize TV?  Steve Summers | 03/12/07
Insane  voska | 03/12/07
Political nightmare  tic swayback | 03/12/07
Right on the mark!  George Mitchell | 03/12/07
Some worries though...  tic swayback | 03/12/07
That all sounds quite normal to me ..  George Mitchell | 03/12/07
That's three months AFTER the election!  tomford@... | 03/12/07
Probably a response to lobbiest  voska | 03/12/07
Another Government Boondoggle  Saugus | 03/12/07
2009 is looking like a good year  Jack-Booted EULA | 03/12/07
The price of converters just went up $80  du2vye | 03/12/07
Cable users not impacted?  JohnQPublic | 03/13/07
Only affects Over-The-Air signal, not cable  NotQuite | 03/13/07
I don't think that was the point  bus7821 | 03/13/07
Let them use Tivo!  hines1957@... | 03/14/07
Wish we could!  woscar | 03/20/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here