On mySimon: Toy Concept Polaris Rush Snowmobile
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
Depends on workload...
CPU intensive workloads with small working sets (that have high on-board cache hit ratios) should do well.

Larger workloads (memory wise) will need to wait for newer memory-access technologies to acheive the full potential of the CPUs.
Posted by: Plain Logic   Posted on: 10/21/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Intel's got back its mojo  Prognosticator | 10/20/06
Agreed (nt)  fizzmaster | 10/20/06
From somebody running a Core 2 Duo E6700...  Linux_Fanboy | 10/20/06
Not from what I hear.  Uber Dweeb | 10/22/06
Is there a better word then WOW?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/20/06
Not if you're talking about price and power  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/20/06
Depends on workload...  Plain Logic | 10/21/06
Developers no longer need High End PCs?  mighetto | 10/20/06
Server = Thousand points of failure  Linux User 1 | 10/20/06
Funny all the fault tolerant companies were servers  oldsysprog | 10/20/06
12 years  Linux User 1 | 10/21/06
12 years  Linux User 1 | 10/21/06
Servers are no mainframes  Linux User 1 | 10/21/06
All depends on the application  nucrash | 10/21/06
China?  mobrien_12@... | 10/21/06
Intel is in China...  Linux User 1 | 10/21/06
in china, yes... fab? no  doh123 | 10/22/06
China chips  Linux User 1 | 10/22/06
Assembly And Test In China  SemiconEng | 10/23/06
Huh?  the_seb | 10/23/06
Each technology (servers, mainframes, ...) have their place...  Plain Logic | 10/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here