On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 21 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
Feeding trolls
You do not know what OS and Photoshop Apple had used on MacExpo 2003,

Neither did you, trollboi.

you do not know how B&W G3 are running with a bigger hard drive on OS 10.2 (default 6 Gig was an Apple joke).

Does a 30 GB drive qualify?

If OS 9 was OK for B&W G3 why OS 10.2 is not?

Works fine for me and everyone else I know who owns a B&W G3 and runs JAGUAR on it. Maybe you're just plain incompetent?

You did not know that performance of beta
Photoshop on beta Panther was far below any imagination (MacExpo 2003), etc.


MacExpo 2003 was the Developer's release of Panther, not the beta. But then again, you haven't made any sense so far, so why start now?

If ignorance is your argument ? you have right to do it, but you cannot win.

Only one of us looks ignorant right now and it's not me...

It looks that the truth is hurting you and Apple too much.

Nothing's hurting me at all. Are you sure your straightjacket isn't on too tight?


If Apple lost the case ? it means that Apple was 100% wrong and this is a proven fact. Can you get it?

Ah, blatent misrepresentation of the US legal system as well. I'm so happy you didn't break character on this one. Settling a case means that they don't even have to admit wrongdoing...

If you can - stop using your senseless examples because your false statements indirectly hurt Apple.

Hmmm. The examples I brought up is what you said. If you want to call yourself a liar, be my guest. You seem to believe what you have to say more than me...

Or maybe common sense is far beyond of what you can do?

P.S. Do not forget I am talking about Jaguar (not OS 10.1.5)


You talk about common sense and then spout this dribble... OS X 10.2.x happens to run much faster than 10.1.5. Make up your mind here, if you have one...
Posted by: dscherf   Posted on: 10/31/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Apple did nothing wrong  KTLA | 10/30/03
need more info  stephen732@... | 10/30/03
Discontinued or not doesn't matter  voska | 10/30/03
Funny though  Rick_K | 10/30/03
Apple has no excuse  voska | 10/30/03
MS  pschroeder@... | 10/30/03
OS X Refund  Travitzky | 10/30/03
Oh goodness, now they'll be hounded and blacklisted  FilledOut | 10/30/03
Fruit iMacs?  ndelc | 10/30/03
It ran fine on both....  Rick_K | 10/30/03
I dont' own a MAC and probably never will, but...  toadlife | 10/30/03
You think Windows 95 is fast on it  dscherf | 10/30/03
Im in the Money  boatelc | 10/30/03
Fair to Whom?  NBSF | 10/31/03
Check The Details  tommylotto | 10/31/03
Apple still did not get the point.  Vily Clay | 10/30/03
Your veracity is in doubt  dscherf | 10/31/03
Are you sure?  Vily Clay | 10/31/03
Still out of the loop, aren't you?  dscherf | 10/31/03
Is it good to judge things you do not know?  Vily Clay | 10/31/03
Feeding trolls  dscherf | 10/31/03
Thank you for entertainment.  Vily Clay | 10/31/03
@Vily's reply  dscherf | 10/31/03
Can you or not?  Vily Clay | 10/31/03
What are you on?  dscherf | 11/01/03
I can, but can you?  Vily Clay | 11/01/03
"20 times faster" ???  brian ansorge | 12/31/03
Panther runs fine on fruits  c1326 | 10/31/03
Second the Emotion  brian ansorge | 12/31/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here