On MovieTome: Whedon makes an offer on Terminator
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
Intel went from core-less to core-crazy. Is excess the right answer ?
Is there a solid architecture to back up the 80 core plan? Or is this all just fireworks to demonstrate that Intel can do multicore and exceed SUNs current plans?

It is strange to me to see this appearance of shift og interest to large counts of cores. Intel clinged to their low core / socket count (four) for the last thenty-five years. The reason for this was that the volume market was with the very low count SMPs. The multi-core/socket market is still a niche for the HPC communitities or outfits of the likes of banks or Google.

What did Intel see in the high CPU count market? S/w is still the prevailing problem there. The developers of specialized applications (numerical computing) could leverage (in many cases) more cores. This is still a narrow niche. It seems that Intel now is after the dreamy world of next-generation computing.

These latecomer finding of faith in areas negelected systematically by Intel makes me wonder how much they are committed in pursuing this lengthy and rocky road.

If they can stay the course, that's good for all of us... In the worst case the forefront of this technology would have advanced.

Incidentally, IBM appears to be slowly exiting the "exotic architecture" path and starts promoting more mainstream systems. As a matter of fact, there seem to be ongoing discussions with AMD to let them produce motherboards come Power7.

It's just amazing that all this progress was instigated to the largest extent by AMD and its success with Opterons !

Progress w/o competition is next to impossible.
Posted by: Dr-T   Posted on: 09/26/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

80?  CobraA1 | 09/26/06
80 Cores is no problem...  BitTwiddler | 09/26/06
I wonder ...  Henaway | 09/26/06
I agree  CobraA1 | 09/26/06
I figured it all out.  nucrash | 09/26/06
You left off a view  mrlinux | 09/26/06
Spyware, viruses, and WGA eat all 80 cores  swoopee | 09/26/06
and that's why  nix_hed | 09/27/06
How to use 80 cores  Suicida| | 09/26/06
Very easy to have 50 cores utilized with Java  mighetto | 09/26/06
To answer your question, BSD UNIX i.e.: Mac OS X  gtdworak | 09/26/06
How to use 80 cores  borandi | 09/26/06
Image processing, etc.  kwahoo | 09/26/06
Message has been deleted.  BeGoneFool | 09/26/06
thet became core envy but not savy ... happy  michael_t | 09/26/06
Hmmm...  zkiwi | 09/26/06
Let's see..  Wolfie2K3 | 09/27/06
No point in having 80 cores if  zzz1234567890 | 09/26/06
computer on a chip  zzz1234567890 | 09/26/06
Gee...  Wolfie2K3 | 09/27/06
MAME performance  #_z | 09/26/06
Intel also whining that if US healthcare system doesn't get fixed, they'll  HypnoToad | 09/26/06
Sorry Intel IBM's cell chip is alread there...!!  rshimizu12@... | 09/26/06
From the company that brought you OS/2 and Pover PC NT  TonyMcS | 09/26/06
Intel went from core-less to core-crazy. Is excess the right answer ?  Dr-T | 09/26/06
Beowulf  mobrien_12@... | 09/26/06
Beofuld is a cluster but the 80 core system is an SMP on a chip.  michael_t | 09/26/06
Ummm YEAH  mobrien_12@... | 09/26/06
If Intel comes out with more than 8 cores  BCF1968 | 09/26/06
be shocked. Intel already sells 8 core chips  Prognosticator | 09/27/06
I am shocked  BCF1968 | 09/28/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here