On GameSpot: Get ready for the Best of 2009 Awards!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
Pooh-poohing what you don't understand?
Where to begin....

First, it's important to understand the difference between this "home-grown" comuter and Ghandi/Nehru satyagraha. From the earliest conceptual descriptions, Simputer was imagined as a platform that could be useful throughout the third world and emerging world. And the entire platform is heavily dependent on international communication: It's heavily reliant on open-source software, which is inherently global in scope. In sum, the Simputer reaches out, not in; it's a market-embracing strategy, not a market-controlling one.

Second, it's important to understand that the tendency in India and China to produce their own software isn't really a matter of economics, as much as it is a matter of making software that makes sense locally. Most people in India are very, very poor, so it doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense to require high-end hardware. Also, most are not well-educated, so it makes sense to create a device that has real usability for people accustomed only to pen and paper.

Third, it's easy to look at the R19K ($450) price and say "that's no good for poor people." You're right -- it's too high. But a) that's not the poor person's model (they'd use the $250 model), and b) the idea behind the Simputer platform was that it would be used by several people -- possibly shared among a whole village. That's both why it's so large (gotta have space for all those ports and the smart card) and why the price point is high.

Fourth, making a computer that works for the local market isn't as simple as slapping a new interface onto Windows. We all know how poorly Windows fits the OSI model; but Simputer, like many Open Source platforms, is fundamentally n-tiered, and so can much more readily be customized for local presentation. They could be selling these things into China next (and as I understand the licensing, the Chinese could take and run with this idea without much cost).

Finally, your last comment is quite odd: "Open source is no way to build a hugely profitable software industry."

Really. Well, I tell you what: Why don't you go tell that to IBM? I'm sure they'll welcome the correction to their strategy, and will be happy to go back to banging their head against the stony gates of Castle Redmond. Truth of the matter is that if your industry is built around commodity software development (as India's is), then Open Source platforms are the best foundation to start from. You seem to make the common error of assuming that basing your software on an OS platform means you can't sell it. You can, of course, and if you play your license right you don't even have to open-source it.

The bottom line on Simputer is really that this is an interesting and powerful platform -- with all those ports and a clean n-tier, open-source application framework, it's a hacker's dream-machine. Something like this, if not this itself, is liable to be one of the catalysts for development of a new and powerful computer industry in East and South Asia.
Posted by: escoles@...   Posted on: 03/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Simputer debut  ahmad@... | 03/29/04
Your life better not depend on apps for Simputer  Anton Philidor | 03/29/04
Pray tell, Anton  Fred Fredrickson | 03/29/04
Prayer is answered  Anton Philidor | 03/29/04
you can have profitable proprietary sw based on open standards (nt)  stephen732@... | 03/29/04
"Name a profitable company built on open source."  escoles@... | 03/30/04
Only if they stop selling hardware & services (NT)  Anton Philidor | 03/30/04
See, you're half way there...  escoles@... | 03/30/04
I'm writing as fast as I can. Quit knocking so loudly.  Anton Philidor | 03/30/04
What about thier software that runs on Linux  voska | 03/30/04
How about Oracle and IBM  voska | 03/30/04
re: Your life better not depend o  Iain_Peters | 03/29/04
Think ambitiously  Anton Philidor | 03/29/04
re: Think amb...  Iain_Peters | 03/29/04
What makes sense, is...  escoles@... | 03/30/04
Pooh-poohing what you don't understand?  escoles@... | 03/30/04
No, pish-tushing what I've heard often.  Anton Philidor | 03/30/04
Your statements are not up to ....  navaltiger | 03/31/04
To expensive. Buy a real computer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/29/04
Re: To expensive. Buy a real computer...??  ahmad@... | 03/29/04
wow - $500.00  V Sanders | 03/29/04
Think about what you just said...  AbsolutelyNot | 03/29/04
Amen!  kennethsf | 04/08/04
Bitty's miffed its not a Windows device  jellyclock | 03/29/04
Does India rule the world now?  newid2092@... | 03/29/04
No one forced you to read the story.  Robert Carnegie | 03/30/04
Quantity has a Quality all it's own  escoles@... | 03/30/04
Brain drain for financial gain...  xunil skcor | 03/30/04
Better get used to it...  Alpha_Female | 03/30/04
RE: this is WRONG  newid2092@... | 03/30/04
get a grip  think_hard | 03/30/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and