On TV.com: 5 TV Shows We'd Love on the BIG SCREEN
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 7:
« Previous
And got more hardware that they would have otherwise
The original post asked if Linux could scale to that level. Seeing that it already has on many occasions, the answer is a resounding yes.

As an aside, Windows *TRIES* to compete in the supercomputer/clustering market. What's it called... Windows HPC or something like that? Sad thing is it's floundering under its own licensing costs. Nobody wants to pay license per processor, per user when it comes to a cluster of ANY size.

A university could take 16 or 32 surplus P4s and build a cluster for no additional cost using Linux. Windows would cost out the yin-yang. See why HPC will never get off the ground?
Posted by: Sabz5150   Posted on: 09/07/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

32,000 processors and no license fee for Linux!  whisperycat | 09/07/06
So  Loverock Davidson | 09/07/06
No it isn't Microsoft's market  Sabz5150 | 09/07/06
was Linux meant to scale...  spatula6 | 09/07/06
Look at the top 500 supercomputers in the world  Sabz5150 | 09/07/06
That they spent all their money on hardware?  CattleProd | 09/07/06
And got more hardware that they would have otherwise  Sabz5150 | 09/07/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline