Debate rages over Internet phone fees

TalkBack 5 of 14:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

The idea

being why 'build a network around a single aplication and charge discriminately and biased against a network wich is fully functional wich uses any application that chooses to do so.

Idea of 'aplication,or single application 'network - a single application is given via cable networks on the traditional scale.When 'if -in-fact IS a network,..is completely capable of being non-discrimanory of applications available ,and who is offering them,or what lines are being carried by them.

Confused is the idea of 'artificial objectivity wich is namely subjective taste-touch-sound-touch,wich is completely non-imagination. And that wich is 'artificial and needs not necesity to be of the same experience of catalyst. That is productivity is the catalyst of wich an objectivity of aplication is based unbiased to an expectation to discriminate necity from catalyst itself. Need only practice some preferencial applications in order to be persuaded of the benifit of them.

A network wich includes them,or excludes them certainly should not benfits from those who could choose to use them.Since the accesory of acess has only non-biased benifits deeming 'end-to-end contigant of all those participating - wich are quite numerous.

There is a real utility in the digital form wich does not have to take its shapes within the objectivity wich traditional experience hasn't modeled .

The simplest idea was that towards the edge end of the presentation in wich 'economic benifits vrs price discrimination''. The value is within the utility of the digital relationship. It is a real value. Wich involves all participants representing the applications developed,or utilized by them.

Not a single entity,with a single utility within a single network,dealing a single application,holding the lines,hardware,to its own person.

Much as for the electic company anology,a GE toaster,or Westing House microwave - still run using the same 'utility of electricity. Because it is an exectaple standard not to have to purchase 'all electronic devices from the electric utility. Wich derives economic benifits the accesories wich can be run.

I dont understand Mr.Comcast.In wich I can tell if he is 'pro business,or pro consumer (or con either way). In wich the person of the computer user dealing with the mp3,video,or space - is somehow interfering with a businesses ISP access. Dont recognize this as being contextually explicit example . At first thought seems to be the bearing of joe computer user to be somekind of 'faulty part on the acess of business to ISPs.But he later describes 'assuming indescrimated 'TCP/IP - only when the 'lines existed.

The line he quoted is most likely the reason so much ado is placed on the word 'content. In this case 'unhindered 'content would have to involve 'person. Although that person can be as well subjective. And remains non-defined within rules of business,and standards of patronage.




....just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 03/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Email Security and Archiving - Clearer in the Cloud Google The time is NOW for businesses and organizations of all sizes to implement ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now