On CBS.com: Get More On Amazing Race Eliminated Team
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Huh...
The general public cares as much about processors as they care about the OS. They just buy what is in their price range. The only people that care about processors and bus speeds are gamers and geeks, and they already know not to buy a celeron and to get the faster bus speed. This is just another marketing ploy. I can't wait for the questions of "is this 700 better than my P4?" or "is this a new type of computer?" I wonder how many people will go buy a new computer just because they think it is a new type of processor and not just a renamed one.
Posted by: Patrick Jones   Posted on: 03/18/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Great concept and a viable idea  US Chistian | 03/17/04
as long as the number are real  JWatson77 | 03/17/04
Huh...  Patrick Jones | 03/18/04
Bogus marketing BullStuffing!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/17/04
I stopped counting when it reaches 20  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/17/04
Clock speed is meaningless, BUT  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/17/04
one meaningless number...  ryusen | 03/17/04
Intelligence  Taco Warrior | 03/17/04
Logical move as Pentium 4 is dying...  Bertavenger | 03/18/04
The marketing result of raw processor speed limits.  JonathonDoe | 03/18/04
BullHockey  HDS_CC | 03/18/04
OK, so it's psuedo-random.  JonathonDoe | 03/18/04
you may be right  HDS_CC | 03/19/04
Clockspeed alone is the the most bogus of metrics...  MrEMann | 03/18/04
MrEMann, we agree...  JonathonDoe | 03/18/04
Clock speed has always be bogus  voska | 03/18/04
Cross line metric  James Dean_z | 03/18/04
How often is the processor the bottleneck anyway  Burnsie001 | 03/18/04
What Apple and Mac users have been saying  MacCanuck | 03/19/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here