On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 6:
Next »
« Previous
yes, there is an x86 box that scales to 32 CPUs
Actually, The IBM x460 (see www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/xseries/x460.html) scales up to 32 CPUs and 64GB of RAM (NUMA architecture) and is a good platform for virtualization (e.g VMware).

Its an interesting discussion of using a virtualized platform such as this (scale up) vs. using blades (scale out) as there advantages and disadvantes to each approach. Which is better all depends on what you are doing.

Scale-up (rack-mmount 4-32 CPUs w/VMware)
=========================================

Plus: better utilization of total CPU cycles and memory across VMs (an app running on a blade can't use spare CPU cycles on another blade)

Plus: lower cost integration into a SAN (fewer HBAs and FC ports requried) and into a network (fewer switch ports needed)

Plus: more granular control over CPU and memoy utilization

Plus: scales up for apps like database servers which don't always scale out as nicely (depends on the application)

Minus: a single hardware failure or hardware maitenance event could take down dozens of apps
at a time (VMware vmotion and other technologies can minimize this effect to some extent)

Minus: Per-CPU initial acquisition cost of the server platform is higher, but this reverses as you add more apps. Hardware is more proprietary.

2-CPU Blade servers
===================

Plus: A hardware failure or hardware maintenance event for a single blade only brings down the app(s) running on that blade.

Plus: Per-CPU intial hardware acquisition cost is lower since blades are more commoditized than 4-32 cpu boxes.

Plus: Real hardware-level isloation between apps running on different blades (though VMware provides virtual-hardware isolation). The chance is slim that an app running on a VM can affect another VM on the same box, it could theoreticaly happen, making blades slightly more crash-proof.
Posted by: vconroy@...   Posted on: 06/20/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Blades make no sense  Roger Ramjet | 06/15/06
Good point  JMarchesoni | 06/15/06
How about reducing cabling by 90+% ?  JackPastor | 06/30/06
Have you ever worked in a data center ??  JackPastor | 06/16/06
yes, there is an x86 box that scales to 32 CPUs  vconroy@... | 06/20/06
A Kludge  JackPastor | 06/30/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline