On The Insider: White House Party Crashers Won't Testify
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
re : someday zd will add reply text
"Another idea could be to limit those that have access to the information....like possibly other domain holders. And if requests for the information are recorded, then it would be very easy to track down anyone that abuses that information. I don't see this as a big deal and it wouldn't require that much effort. "

100% agree, this information can be requested with a court order like other data, no reason to let avery Tom, Dick and Harry have access to it
Posted by: lmaxwell   Posted on: 10/28/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  Stevo_z | 10/28/03
Re:Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  DB_z | 10/28/03
re : someday zd will add reply text  lmaxwell | 10/28/03
RE: Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  nrlz | 10/28/03
how about selling our data  lmaxwell | 10/28/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here