On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Anonymity is not necessary for privacy
I agree. That is the only necessary step needed to solve all of the listed problems.

And perhaps have an option for domain registrants to choose whether to have their information public or private.
Posted by: nrlz   Posted on: 10/28/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  Stevo_z | 10/28/03
Re:Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  DB_z | 10/28/03
re : someday zd will add reply text  lmaxwell | 10/28/03
RE: Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  nrlz | 10/28/03
how about selling our data  lmaxwell | 10/28/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here