On TV.com: The BIGGEST LOSER Yet
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
Re:Anonymity is not necessary for privacy
Another idea could be to limit those that have access to the information....like possibly other domain holders. And if requests for the information are recorded, then it would be very easy to track down anyone that abuses that information. I don't see this as a big deal and it wouldn't require that much effort.
Posted by: DB_z   Posted on: 10/28/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  Stevo_z | 10/28/03
Re:Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  DB_z | 10/28/03
re : someday zd will add reply text  lmaxwell | 10/28/03
RE: Anonymity is not necessary for privacy  nrlz | 10/28/03
how about selling our data  lmaxwell | 10/28/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here