On mySimon: Bacon Soap
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Following the plan
The plan, you remember, is to have a CEO who changes plans but, most important, lays off essential staff until sales tank. Then that CEO departs with a large severance package and another is hired with a large signing bonus.

This process is repeated until bankruptcy. Then all executives receive large retention bonuses to assure they stay with the company, while surviving employees lose their pensions and their pay is reduced.

A few quotes:
"Before Bishop's arrival in 1999, then-CEO Rick Belluzzo also initiated a turnaround effort at SGI that included cutting 1,500 positions..."

Earned his bonus and being generously severed right there.

Quoting again:
"And under SGI's previous CEO, Bob Bishop, the company launched a restructuring effort in 2000..."

Ahm... do restructuring efforts involve layoffs?
But watch supercomputing. Perhaps a better word is "shuttlecock".

Back to the quote where we were:
"... to shift its focus away from selling supercomputers,..."

[away from supercomputers]

"... multimedia software and embedded chips for consumer devices to one that focused on much smaller markets, such as digital content creation and supercomputing..."

[but toward "supercomputing"]

"... for technical and scientific projects."


The plan continues:
"Its latest was initiated in March, when SGI cut 12 percent of its work force and hired a new chief financial officer and chief operating officer."

The company must have had to lay off staff to pay the executives.

"The moves were part of a plan from McKenna, who was hired as CEO earlier in the year. McKenna said he wanted to expand into new customer markets, such as telecommunications, that have high computing needs."

Earlier than March?
Laying off 12% of staff, including which staff they were, must have been obvious.
And do you think that telecommunications companies (pause to permit you to say "telecommunications??!") might need... supercomputing?
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 05/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

another M$ victim!  Linux Geek | 05/08/06
More like the x86 ruined them  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/08/06
Alt theory  ibabadur1 | 05/08/06
it was the software  Linux Geek | 05/08/06
Wrong again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/08/06
clearly tongue and cheek  Levelhead | 05/08/06
SGI picked the wrong horse with Itanium  rbeetle | 05/08/06
Oh pulease...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/08/06
Itanium had good prospects when SGI chose it. Intel simply  michael_t | 05/08/06
deer infront of headlights  zzz1234567890 | 05/08/06
they tried that actually  Monkey_MCSE | 05/08/06
Too bad that SGI put all their eggs in the Itanium basket  michael_t | 05/08/06
Another one bites the dust...  Mike Cox | 05/08/06
not bad...  Levelhead | 05/08/06
Following the plan  Anton Philidor | 05/08/06
And as judges have let corporations get away with trashing pension funds,  HypnoToad72 | 05/08/06
I wish I could be irresponsible so then I could do the responsible thing.  HypnoToad72 | 05/08/06
you can  specialk_z | 05/08/06
It's a FINANCIAL restructuring, not out of business  Prognosticator | 05/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc