On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
The significance is lost on me
I never dealt much with mainframes, so I wonder what the qualitative difference is from a very large server. True, typically a mainframe runs multiple applications, but Unix was always capable of this (and in early timesharing days, did exactly this), but I think the mainframes in such applications as airline reservations were dedicated to the single application. I am aware that the mainframe wanted to control communications (SNA, I guess), because when I built the campus TCP/IP network we had to insert a box that looked like a slave both to the network and the mainframe.

But I can see from posts above that the mainframe growth looks like a reversal. Can somebody point out significance - thanks.
Posted by: IT_User   Posted on: 02/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Message to Sun, you lost, give us your Java. NOW!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/27/04
I wonder  rapson | 02/27/04
Carl, I agree.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/27/04
Gee, P.T. Barnum WAS right...  Stewart Cannon | 02/27/04
kind of makes you smile  hipparchus | 02/27/04
The significance is lost on me  IT_User | 02/27/04
how mainframes are different  hipparchus | 02/29/04
Cool things an IBM mainframe can do...  Norm_z | 02/29/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline