On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 27:
« Previous
How a big company MISSES a good chance and conversely
how mush smaller ones get to have breakthroughs.

Itanium is STILL Work in Progress. It needs more improvements and more tools to make the transition to it SMOOTH and NOT MARRED with exorbitant efforts and nasty surprises. Intel DID NOT stuck to it and gave up. So did pretty much everyone else, except from SGI which is now stuck with an Itanium that slowly goes to oblivion.

This is pathetic on the part of Intel and HP. I am not thrilled with Itanium-2, nor so much with IA-64, but they both are MUCH better than the xeons and pentiums and all the dinosauric 64 bit 80x86 monsters that Intel decided to resurrect.

IA-64 needs refinments as does Itanium. What is strange to me, is how on earth Intel was supposedly planning the Itanium for the high end server and HPC markets, but neither bothered to design the appropriate chipsets, nor did they design a high capacity interconnect and ccNUMA protocol.

Intel can succeed but they need to focus on long-term benefits and get over their desire for immediate cash inflow. They have to keep pushing for it.

I do like AMD because they stuck to their guns and finally delivered the right solution for the right market niche. I DO NOT like the 80x86 ISA becomming 64 bit ofcourse. This is prolonging something that should had died 10 years ago (or more).

Imagine how humorous would be a situation where AMD would take over Itanium-2 improvement plans!
Posted by: michael_t   Posted on: 12/08/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

poor performance per dollar  ~doolittle~ | 12/07/05
Not really  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
and you had a fantastic compiler  balsover | 12/07/05
The idealized one  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
Then it is pointless, isn't it? Not such a great idea after all  balsover | 12/07/05
History lesson  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
Great Comments!  DemonX | 12/07/05
Well...  techboy_z | 12/07/05
The InHell mac  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
Mactel  jheine | 12/07/05
Actually...  techboy_z | 12/07/05
Partly true  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
Re. compile for speed  techboy_z | 12/07/05
In a perfect world...  balsover | 12/07/05
Remember the InHell iAPX432 ?  Steven J. Ackerman | 12/07/05
From the article you linked to  balsover | 12/07/05
A few comments on what is "good" architecture for the future  michael_t | 12/08/05
Always starts. . . . . . .  a.techno.geek | 12/07/05
What people don't get  Roger Ramjet | 12/07/05
Perhaps you are the one that is wrong  balsover | 12/07/05
Did they really blow it?  Roger Ramjet | 12/08/05
Yes they did.  balsover | 12/09/05
Thumbs up!  sys_engineer | 12/07/05
A better question  Roger Ramjet | 12/08/05
cost?  balsover | 12/09/05
Message has been deleted.  myfevertoy | 10/22/06
How a big company MISSES a good chance and conversely  michael_t | 12/08/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here