On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 79:
Next »
« Previous
You're refusing to see some basic facts
"that the whoever determines what is to be done with the spent fuel is supposed to package it up into individual gift packages to place under people's bed?"

No, we put it in Yuka Mountain. The better option is to reprocess most of it for fresh Uranium. The problem is that the anti-Nuclear lobby (which you?ve bought in to) refuse to see the light and will do anything to stop any kind of progress in Nuclear reprocessing and waste management. They?re doing anything to stop Yuka Mountain with lawsuits demanding that the site be secured for 1 million years which is completely ludicrous. Ludicrous is the whole point because they know they can tie it up in court forever with idiot judges. The point is that they can sabotage good clean Nuclear waste management and make it impossible to have nuclear energy in this country. I?m not making this stuff up, this is exactly what their strategy is.

The other tactic used by the anti-Nuclear lobby is that they will physically block trains carrying nuclear waste claiming that the transport isn?t safe. What?s never told by the main stream press is that you can drop these containers from 10,000 feet on to solid rock and no radiation or waste will leak out. Your problem is that you refuse to acknowledge any kind of common sense because you?ve been brain washed in to believing anything Nuclear is bad.

"When you scale it up you can't handle it by placing it into Borosilicate glass and shoving it under a bed. The solution does not scale up well."

All the nuclear waste in the world per year would barely fill an acre. What in the world are you talking about when you say "does not scale up well"? The bed thing is just a figurative point that I would personally be fine with having a shoe box full of 100% contained nuclear waste in my house. Get over the bed thing, the stuff is not that bad. There are much more dangerous materials than Nuclear waste which came from nature in the first place. The only difference is that it?s in concentrated form which can be safely contained.
Posted by: george_ou   Posted on: 11/22/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I am so sick of this  baggins_z | 11/22/05
Correct - You are so sick  panzrwagn | 11/22/05
Well you could try wind power  DarthRidiculous | 11/22/05
Re: Well you could try wind power  wackoae | 11/22/05
Actually  Linux Advocate | 11/22/05
Wind power does have an effect  voska | 11/23/05
And You are delusional  middle of nowhere | 11/24/05
MARS global warming  LWEM | 11/25/05
Feel free to do as you please...  nucrash | 11/22/05
Are you crazy?  buran | 11/22/05
Actually environmentalists are the reason for ...  ShadeTree | 11/22/05
still  MIS Master | 11/22/05
SUVs  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
So let them move in with the Indians  balsover | 11/22/05
They're also responsible for...  Doc Farmer | 11/23/05
NOT!!!  thetruth_z | 11/23/05
Are you volunteering to place a nuclear waste dump in your backyard sport?  balsover | 11/22/05
Yes I am  george_ou | 11/22/05
So, you are suggesting  balsover | 11/22/05
You're refusing to see some basic facts  george_ou | 11/22/05
Can't be done because of people like you  george_ou | 11/22/05
Yucca mtn.  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
You proved my point  george_ou | 11/22/05
Clue train nearly derails slamming on the brakes  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
Brainwashing  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
Shorter George Ou.....  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
Meltdown Proof Reactors  PoFigster | 11/23/05
Nice link  george_ou | 11/23/05
Zero emissions is nuclear  george_ou | 11/22/05
Does that include the waste products?  balsover | 11/22/05
I said zero emission in to the air we breathe  george_ou | 11/22/05
RE: I said zero emission in to the air we breathe  balsover | 11/22/05
100 Years???  middle of nowhere | 11/24/05
So waste less...  johnay | 11/23/05
Also a nice link  george_ou | 11/23/05
So the whole Chernobyl thing  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
No, it was a joke of a design by the USSR  george_ou | 11/22/05
lol kind of like planes versus cars  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
Foolish comparisons  george_ou | 11/22/05
Stupid rationalizations  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
What's stupid is forcing the use of coal  george_ou | 11/22/05
Clue train conductor may have boot George off  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/22/05
He is right Jackboot  osreinstall | 11/22/05
ad hominem  PoFigster | 11/23/05
ad hominem  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/23/05
Also keep in mind....  nucrash | 11/23/05
Just to wade in here  voska | 11/23/05
Are you kidding  george_ou | 11/23/05
You keep believing that  voska | 11/23/05
Ignorance of Econ 101  george_ou | 11/23/05
Yes about 100 died...  Linux Advocate | 11/22/05
And your alternative is?  voska | 11/23/05
Simple  Linux Advocate | 11/23/05
perhaps you should go around wormwood with a radiation detector  hipparchus2001 | 11/23/05
. . . was due to poor design - and we're coming close to an alternative  CobraA1 | 11/23/05
remember three mile island  hipparchus2001 | 11/23/05
"and there isn't much fuel left in the world."  CobraA1 | 11/26/05
N-power Plants.. are perfect targets ...  thetruth_z | 11/22/05
Cut energy, increase quality of life  Nigel Johnstone | 11/22/05
Nigel  Linux Advocate | 11/23/05
Not practical  cyanblade | 11/23/05
You are not thinking are you...  Linux Advocate | 11/23/05
Obesity is caused by the greed not sloth  voska | 11/23/05
You are ignoring the problem  cyanblade | 11/23/05
try getting into one of those.  bchesmer | 11/23/05
biodiesel algae  hipparchus2001 | 11/23/05
My issue with Nuclear power  hipparchus2001 | 11/23/05
there is little uranium left in the world.......  middle of nowhere | 11/24/05
you need lots  hipparchus2001 | 11/24/05
Unfounded  george_ou | 11/24/05
uranium usage 41000t in 2003 global reserves 2 million tonnes = 50 years  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
annual increase in use about 5%  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
plutonium 239  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
uranium usage 41000t in 2003 global reserves 2 million tonnes = 50 years  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
uranium usage 41000t in 2003 global reserves 2 million tonnes = 50 years  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
uranium usage 41000t in 2003 global reserves 2 million tonnes = 50 years  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
uranium usage 41000t in 2003 global reserves 2 million tonnes = 50 years  hipparchus2001 | 11/27/05
Where do you get that impression, anyways?  CobraA1 | 11/26/05
This has been another Google Memories Post :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 08/28/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline