On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
Not the same thing.
A copyright applies to a particular implementation of an idea. A patent applies to the idea itself. If someone patented the idea of showing dialogs, for instance, you as a developer couldn't use dialogs in your applications without licensing them, even if you used entirely different code to achieve the same result.

This makes sense if you've invented something physical (a thingumajig that does something no one's thought of before). It makes no sense in software. Software patents are a stupid idea, and I hope they all get thrown out. The ability to copyright your methods is fine, and if someone steals your methods they deserve to be punished for it. But the ability to patent an abstract such as a computer program is absurd.
Posted by: Damon K   Posted on: 01/28/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Good  Bill4 | 01/28/04
It would be nice...  Chris Moller | 01/28/04
You are correct  Bill4 | 01/28/04
Wow !  Update victim | 01/28/04
NT What about copyrights for software?  jerry@... | 01/28/04
Not the same thing.  Damon K | 01/28/04
Not *exactly* true...  Frank MacCrory | 01/28/04
Also, at the time -  Robert Carnegie | 02/02/04
A good first step  AbsolutelyNot | 01/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More