- TalkBack 18 of 23:
- Next »
- « Previous
- Thread View
- Flat View
- Thoughts
-
[? Intel's strategy is to bet on people not making the transition to a new programming model.]
InHell has learned MUCH from its Itanic! Changing programming paradigms for HUGE speed increases is NOT a sellable point - at this time. As complicated as it is to change compilers to handle VLIW EPIC-style instructions, it is MORE complicated to program for "grid-like" processors. InHell has wisened up and learned the "human factor" of the computer biz. Eventually, Moore's Law runs out (45nm will be it!), and when THAT happens, silicon sizes will be FINITE - therefore, the ONLY way to increase computing "power" is to move "unneccessary stuff" from the chip - i.e. extra pipelining code. THAT'S when the Itanic will sail again! THAT is InHell's long-term strategy - and like the tortoise, EPIC WILL win the race.
? It's not clear where Microsoft is going - but the smart money is that they'll try to have it both ways: letting Windows/XP run out the x86 string, and focusing on entertainment functions for the X360 while working to deliver the distributed OS ideas behind the original Longhorn vision in the X360 network environment before leveraging that back into the office as an NT/x86 replacement.
M$ has WAY too much money, so they are investing in multiple streams of technology. Other than Windoze and Office, they have LOST MONEY at ALL of their other "misadventures", including X-box - but the key here is NOT MUCH money! I see M$ as the consumate roulette player - spreading their chips ALL over the table, in the hopes of hitting big. Windoze and Office keep the chips comming . . .
? IBM will use Linux on Cell throughout its product line and is clearly committed to developing tools that make existing Linux applications work well, working on advanced parallelization software for the science markets, and letting Sony drive work on the visualization side of the tools and applications business.
IBM DOESN'T CARE if they "win" with hardware or not. Their $350/hr consulting business is safe no matter WHAT the underlying technology is. The CELL is just their way of getting something out of their thousands of PhDs and patents. Their strategy with Linux is as "loss-leader", as they proclaim all sorts of great things you can do with Linux, but in the end, they can't do them and you end up getting upsold to P-series and AIX.
? Sun's public strategy is to build applications support on its open source heritage, integrate cheaper, faster, storage with their on chip SMP offerings, and push Solaris more and more into the direction of the Plan9 second generation Unix ideas: really the core Unix ideas migrated from a machine focus to a network focus -delivering user services from anywhere to anywhere.
Sun is right. Sun is best at delivering. But CIOs consider buying Sun as much as they consider buying Daewoo's - it just ISN'T on their radar, and probably never will be. The dot-com era was good for Sun because the buyers of their equipment were numerous and NOT large companies (by and large). The small start-ups found Sun the best for their needs (and many heard the "buzz" and just went with Sun anyway). The dot-bomb hurt Sun disproportionately - since they sold the most, those bankruptcy sales of used Sun equipment KILLED them. I see a nice article in ZDnet yesterday about how flash memory could replace tape! Interesting that Sun just spent too much money on StorageTek . . . - Posted by: Roger Ramjet Posted on: 09/14/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
What do you think?
SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads
- Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
- Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
- The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
- Learn more about tools to grow your business
-
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
- Save time with the UPS Business Essentials Guide
- Keep Up With The Latest In Document Management with The DocuMentor.
-
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
- Learn more >>
- The more you simplify, the more you save
-
When you transition from your existing Red Hat environment to SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, you can recognize dramatic cost savings, perhaps as much 50%
- Learn more >>
- Business Value of Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V and Live Migration.
-
Today's IT departments are under increasing pressure to manage and support expanding computer resources while reducing costs. See how Windows Server 2008 R2 is making this process seamless.

- Click to download >>
- New Online Dashboard for IT Leaders
-
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
- Learn more >>
- Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online - Free Six-Month Trial for Eligible Organizations
-
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online provides fast online access, simple contact management and better sales performance for a low monthly cost - the best value on the market today.

- Learn more about the free, six-month trial offer >>
SmartPlanet
- Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
- More from IBM
- How to Drive Better Business Outcomes with Exceptional Web Experiences Download the eBook
- Driving Business Agility through SOA Connectivity & Integration Read the White Paper from IBM
- Linking Decisions and Information for Organizational Performance Read the Tom Davenport study






