On TV.com: Which Shows Are About to Get the AXE?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
why not AMD 64?
You got 64 procs, a cap to 4GB of RAM, and only 32 bit code. Does not sound too smart for me!
Should they have used AMD's 64 proc. they would have had room for more memory and exposure to 32 & 64 bit software.
Posted by: dg mh   Posted on: 01/15/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Why not 64-bit G5 but 32-bit Xeon? What?s wrong with G5? (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/14/04
Spank the Microturds  SloooeShflu | 01/14/04
They already have PowerPC servers!  MeMyselfAndI_z | 01/15/04
Did IBM estimate G5 lower than Xeon and Jobs? opinion about? (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/15/04
why not AMD 64?  dg mh | 01/15/04
No 64-bit AMD is maybe politics, but no 64-bit G5 is a mystery.  Vily Clay | 01/15/04
agree  dg mh | 01/15/04
It?s hard to believe they made G5 for Apple only. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/15/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More