On TV.com: Top 15 TV THEME Songs
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 8:
Next »
Why not 64-bit G5 but 32-bit Xeon? What?s wrong with G5? (NT)
(NT)
Posted by: Vily Clay   Posted on: 01/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Why not 64-bit G5 but 32-bit Xeon? What?s wrong with G5? (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/14/04
Spank the Microturds  SloooeShflu | 01/14/04
They already have PowerPC servers!  MeMyselfAndI_z | 01/15/04
Did IBM estimate G5 lower than Xeon and Jobs? opinion about? (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/15/04
why not AMD 64?  dg mh | 01/15/04
No 64-bit AMD is maybe politics, but no 64-bit G5 is a mystery.  Vily Clay | 01/15/04
agree  dg mh | 01/15/04
It?s hard to believe they made G5 for Apple only. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/15/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline