On last.fm: 2009 summer music festivals
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
AMD can win the day if Intel plays fair. in a climate where business treats
bribery and market hype as valid incentives for decision-making, Intel will drive AMD into the dumps.

before Athlon, AMD made their business by making cheaper hardware that was pin compatible with Intel hardware, but not quite as dependable.

then the platforms diverged and AMD had to convince pc-makers to support their's in addition to Intel's.

change is not easy for a business.

i have found that in the post-x586 world that the AMD product is often better and less expensive. this then allows for better tech additions to the platform to come up to an Intel price range.

since the question then is not one of quality or price, there must be some other reason for slow adoption of AMD hardware.

the only logical alternative is unfair tactics by Intel.

the so-called problem with M$ production of a 64-bit windows is a smoke-screen. when the only 64-bit harware was only intel, without 32-bit compatibility, M$ didn't have a problem. then AMD came out with their 64/32-bit processor and M$ couldn't do it until Intel came out with their copy. but windows is still Intel optimized so that the benchmark comparisons have to be taken in their biased context. - and still, windows 64 bit server only runs on itanium.

could it be the M$-Intel marriage that is the real culprit to AMD resistance?

in the business world, boardroom conspiracies are the spice of life.

if it were not for Linux and it's proponents, AMD 64/32-bit would have died on the vine.

M$ inability to crush Linux has prompted Intel to seek other alliances designed to shut AMD down.

will that drive M$ to embrace AMD?

show me the money!

yo.
Posted by: wessonjoe   Posted on: 06/29/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Maybe Intel will only get thier hand slapped, but at least we will know  DonnieBoy | 06/28/05
Yeah, right "market forces" - PLEASE !  realitycheck101 | 06/28/05
Even I don't like Intel but....  ju1ce | 06/28/05
Intel never faltered, AMD bettered them  zzz1234567890 | 06/28/05
You are either....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/28/05
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 06/28/05
I haven't been following this battle..  Jeff Spicoli | 06/28/05
AMD can be a force now  MIS Master | 06/28/05
Next thing AMD  htotten | 06/28/05
nope  doh123 | 06/28/05
it's all of the above...  JoeMama_z | 06/28/05
I figured that Intel's success over AMD was due to.....  JoeMama_z | 06/28/05
Don't think too hard....  nottheusual1 | 06/29/05
your right hardware validation....  JoeMama_z | 06/29/05
So - You buy Intel and I will stick with what works for me.  djc1309@... | 06/29/05
I did get off point...  JoeMama_z | 06/29/05
AMD can win the day if Intel plays fair. in a climate where business treats  wessonjoe | 06/29/05
What REALLY happened at NEC  Prognosticator | 06/29/05
Not really......  nottheusual1 | 06/29/05
WTF?  flatliner | 06/29/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here