On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 6:
Next »
« Previous
There's fair and then there's fair
"The cable companies, such as Time Warner, Comcast and Cox Communications, oppose this approach because, they say, it unfairly favors telephone companies. For example, under this law cable companies would still be subject to the old rules for securing local franchises. The cable companies would also still be required to provide free access channels to communities and free access to municipal buildings, while the phone companies would not be required to make either accommodation."

And how does that really differ from allowing essentially free rein to VoIP companies while continuing to hamper so-called "traditional telcos with heavy regulation? Seems to me that if it's good in one area it's good in another. This is just payback to the telcos for not having a level playing field with VoIP companies.

The idea seems to be that established companies in any field are to be regulated but new companies, especially those incorporating the technology 'flavor of the day', are to be left alone.

Carl Rapson
Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 05/27/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well yes, but  Nigel Johnstone | 05/27/05
There's fair and then there's fair  rapson | 05/27/05
Sounds about right  DarthRidiculous | 05/27/05
prices  cardinal33 | 05/28/05
HA HA  Roger Ramjet | 05/31/05
Um, I think that's why Telco's are moving this way  voska | 05/31/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads