On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 70:
Next »
« Previous
I'd suggest you leave it there too
"If you don't undersand the complexities involved, and the
basics of capitalism that allow for competitive advantage.
(you call it "lock-in" or some other negatively slanted
phrase) and only are going to see it from one
perspective,then it's hopeless. "

You do understand this is about OOXML, a standard
submitted to a standards body. Yes it is complex, and very
difficult for people not knowing what they're doing (e.g.
MS).

"But that failed experiment only rushed the move to
Windows and productivity and, unfortunately, the need of a
number of positions, rose and fell respectively. "

You're claiming fewer people are required to support
windows than *nix server? I'd agree that *nix professionals
are more expensive than MSCE hacks but fewer, now your
making me laugh.

"Anyway, besides modeling Unix/Minix, Linux has done
nothing but try to reproduce the windows experience with
the linux engine."

How does one "models" Unix/Minix? Isn't the "windows
experience" you talk of the copied Apple experience with inconveniences?

"Mono, Samba, the distro with teh Vista look and feel
(poorly done look and feel i might add) and many
hundreds of projects aimed at obtaning MS functionality. "

Confusing functionality with interoperability.

"Perhaps the marketshare of Linux is not taking off from
the very reason you think MS stinks."

Market share is taking off. Linux doing well in Server and exceptionally well in embedded. Only the desktop OS lags
but even there interest is growing (thanks to computing
devices).

I'd suggest you leave it there too, your post is
degenerating into a mindless rant. Not bad going really,
you were wrong about every point you made (e.g. government of England, 100% funding, no OOXML support
in current MS products, etc). From this position MS would
not be fools, but heros:-)
Posted by: Richard Flude   Posted on: 05/27/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If they can't even support it themselves  Michael Kelly | 05/22/08
Exactly!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/08
They had to do something  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
Oh you didn't read the blog?  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Bizarre  Richard Flude | 05/23/08
I'll leave it at this Richard.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
Take a pill, will ya?  TtfnJohn | 05/26/08
Is your rude display of name calling really necessary?  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
I'd suggest you leave it there too  Richard Flude | 05/27/08
Richard, you Mother had great foresight indeed.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
Wow, name substitution how clever;-)  Richard Flude | 05/28/08
Have you ever pledged allegiance to the flag?  Ole Man | 05/24/08
Thanks Ole Man.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
You're welcome, Zuny  Ole Man | 05/26/08
This tool still posting?  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
An accurate diagnosis!  Ole Man | 05/30/08
OOOps  Sagax- | 05/23/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  PB_z | 05/22/08
meant as reply to Michael Kelly (NT)  PB_z | 05/22/08
Not yet  DonRupertBitByte | 05/22/08
Trying to avoid getting fined  PB_z | 05/22/08
Rubbish  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
The prior ruling was re: Windows, but Office is being investigated  PB_z | 05/25/08
Rubbish part 2  Richard Flude | 05/27/08
Rubbish.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
oh, yes, i forgot....  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
" elected by the citizens and held accountable by the citizens and work  Ole Man | 05/27/08
Well, your reply was appropriate this time.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
You CAN'T be a republican!  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
Wrong  Richard Flude | 05/29/08
even M$ can't implement OOXML  Linux Geek | 05/22/08
Wrong again  GuidingLight | 05/22/08
Why?  techboy_z | 05/22/08
Well..  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
So, you say MSO is crap?  Mitch 74 | 05/23/08
Can you help me?  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Yowza! Hey, calm down!  Mitch 74 | 05/24/08
I can help you  carlos.m.camargo@... | 05/25/08
Carlos, you are so funny.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
huh...  Linux Geek | 05/22/08
See what I mean?  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
NO  Hemlock Stones | 05/22/08
Oh  CreepinJesus | 05/23/08
Here - Maybe this will help  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
Unfortunately spikeyMike  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Front end to the business?  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
You know that is wishful thinking.......  linux for me | 05/22/08
So much for defacto standards, eh No Facts?  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
MS can't make OOXML work in...  bjbrock | 05/22/08
I stand corrected then!  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
And also  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
It's not about winning, but there is a winner  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
Says who?  CreepinJesus | 05/23/08
The writing is on the wall.  TripleII | 05/23/08
Because..  CreepinJesus | 05/26/08
Yeah, poor old Microsoft  Ole Man | 05/24/08
Richard thinks Microsoft should be embarrassed.......  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
Hooked on phonics...  jasonp@... | 05/27/08
Jason, allow me to give you  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
A less jandiced look.  TripleII | 05/23/08
BRAVO!!!  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
*sigh*  carlos.m.camargo@... | 05/25/08
Of course you do.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
Microsoft wants to "participate" in OASIS ??? That's Not Good.  Rick S._z | 05/23/08
Free vs. US$200  barence773 | 05/24/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  starcannon99022@... | 05/26/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  starcannon99022@... | 05/26/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility - What about Publisher?  jaja111 | 05/26/08
Microsoft lags on the dull edge again...  Cardinal_Bill | 06/04/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here