On TV.com: CALIFORNICATION'S Hank Needs to Get Hurt
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 70:
Next »
« Previous
Bizarre
"Who do you think is the joke, sir? The leadership?"

Yes

" the engineers and developers?"

Yes

"when you say MS is a joke, isn't that insulting the entire
company?"

Yes. A company that claims billions of dollars in R&D can't produce a document which can survive standardisation
(community did), can't provide interoperability
documentation for EC several years after being charged,
several years to bring out an OS update with most of it's
much talked about features dropped (rest copies of other
OSes).

"Their server market is growing, and this is impressive
since it started out as mixture of government supported
Unix servers and commercial Unix servers over time and
the natural play for old Unix shops was obviously Linux
since it's built on the Unix model down to the rivets."

Unix servers are moving to Linux. Windows servers are
growing the market for servers.

"What is the name of the OS you wrote again?"

MS can't be a joke because it wrote an OS? I'm not sure
that is a very persuasive case;-)

"SUN was 100% federally funded, every bit of it, the OS the
processors, the business, the monopoly exemption the
Works richard."

100%?

"Now people claim SUN was damaged by Microsoft."

MS settled such a claim and paid Sun billions.

"Anyway, as the article said and you and the person quoted
in the blog completely lost sight of, OOXML is supported
by and large now."

Apart from supporting the standard. I believe this was the
point.

"I'll respect your socialism, but why not try to show an
ounce of respect for capitalism."

An attack on MS is now an attack on capitalism;-) Queue
national anthem in background;-)

"Or are you going to tell me there's never been any
corruptio in the English government?"

I think you might be referring to the British Government. There has not been a Government of England since 1707. Whilst I'm sure they have issues I'm not that familiar, I'm
not English.
Posted by: Richard Flude   Posted on: 05/23/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If they can't even support it themselves  Michael Kelly | 05/22/08
Exactly!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/08
They had to do something  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
Oh you didn't read the blog?  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Bizarre  Richard Flude | 05/23/08
I'll leave it at this Richard.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
Take a pill, will ya?  TtfnJohn | 05/26/08
Is your rude display of name calling really necessary?  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
I'd suggest you leave it there too  Richard Flude | 05/27/08
Richard, you Mother had great foresight indeed.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
Wow, name substitution how clever;-)  Richard Flude | 05/28/08
Have you ever pledged allegiance to the flag?  Ole Man | 05/24/08
Thanks Ole Man.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
You're welcome, Zuny  Ole Man | 05/26/08
This tool still posting?  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
An accurate diagnosis!  Ole Man | 05/30/08
OOOps  Sagax- | 05/23/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  PB_z | 05/22/08
meant as reply to Michael Kelly (NT)  PB_z | 05/22/08
Not yet  DonRupertBitByte | 05/22/08
Trying to avoid getting fined  PB_z | 05/22/08
Rubbish  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
The prior ruling was re: Windows, but Office is being investigated  PB_z | 05/25/08
Rubbish part 2  Richard Flude | 05/27/08
Rubbish.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
oh, yes, i forgot....  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
" elected by the citizens and held accountable by the citizens and work  Ole Man | 05/27/08
Well, your reply was appropriate this time.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
You CAN'T be a republican!  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
Wrong  Richard Flude | 05/29/08
even M$ can't implement OOXML  Linux Geek | 05/22/08
Wrong again  GuidingLight | 05/22/08
Why?  techboy_z | 05/22/08
Well..  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
So, you say MSO is crap?  Mitch 74 | 05/23/08
Can you help me?  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Yowza! Hey, calm down!  Mitch 74 | 05/24/08
I can help you  carlos.m.camargo@... | 05/25/08
Carlos, you are so funny.  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
huh...  Linux Geek | 05/22/08
See what I mean?  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
NO  Hemlock Stones | 05/22/08
Oh  CreepinJesus | 05/23/08
Here - Maybe this will help  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
Unfortunately spikeyMike  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
Front end to the business?  SpikeyMike | 05/29/08
You know that is wishful thinking.......  linux for me | 05/22/08
So much for defacto standards, eh No Facts?  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
MS can't make OOXML work in...  bjbrock | 05/22/08
I stand corrected then!  SpikeyMike | 05/22/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
And also  CreepinJesus | 05/22/08
It's not about winning, but there is a winner  Richard Flude | 05/22/08
Says who?  CreepinJesus | 05/23/08
The writing is on the wall.  TripleII | 05/23/08
Because..  CreepinJesus | 05/26/08
Yeah, poor old Microsoft  Ole Man | 05/24/08
Richard thinks Microsoft should be embarrassed.......  xuniL_z | 05/26/08
Hooked on phonics...  jasonp@... | 05/27/08
Jason, allow me to give you  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
A less jandiced look.  TripleII | 05/23/08
BRAVO!!!  xuniL_z | 05/23/08
*sigh*  carlos.m.camargo@... | 05/25/08
Of course you do.  xuniL_z | 05/28/08
Microsoft wants to "participate" in OASIS ??? That's Not Good.  Rick S._z | 05/23/08
Free vs. US$200  barence773 | 05/24/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  starcannon99022@... | 05/26/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF  starcannon99022@... | 05/26/08
RE: OOXML backwards compatibility - What about Publisher?  jaja111 | 05/26/08
Microsoft lags on the dull edge again...  Cardinal_Bill | 06/04/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here