OOXML backwards compatibility led Microsoft to ODF

TalkBack 4 of 70:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Oh you didn't read the blog?

Microsoft substantially supports OOXML, with the "changes required for ratification", you think that's going to happen overnight?


Who do you think is the joke, sir? The leadership? the engineers and developers? when you say MS is a joke, isn't that insulting the entire company? From where i stand, you are the joke to make a blanket statement like that.


For instance. Micrsoft has the most popular client in the world and it works very well, thank you Richard,


Their server market is growing, and this is impressive since it started out as mixture of government supported Unix servers and commercial Unix servers over time and the natural play for old Unix shops was obviously Linux since it's built on the Unix model down to the rivets.


Yet Microsoft forged a great market share and their NT servers are considered among the best in the world now. You honestly think XP, server 2003, server 2008, SQL Server 2005, Sharepoint, Office 2003/2007 are Jokes?


Why do we have to go there every time Richard. What are your credentials? What is the most complex system you've got under your belt? What is the name of the OS you wrote again?

Microsoft is clearly the world leader, and if you are going to say by "force" then don't bother to reply. That is the biggest B.S. that has ever floated here.


SUN was 100% federally funded, every bit of it, the OS the processors, the business, the monopoly exemption the Works richard. Now people claim SUN was damaged by Microsoft. Uh, yeah, no company can be held accountable in a Microsoft world can they? they can't make mistakes can they? Linux isn't full of holes, like Ubuntu proved to be a few releases ago when unpatched servers were owned like nothing even Microsoft has had to deal with.

But this site doesn't report Linux problems. Or very very rarely. It's here to entertain people like you who just can't get enough of being a very very small person.


Anyway, as the article said and you and the person quoted in the blog completely lost sight of, OOXML is supported by and large now.

they need time to implement the required Changes. They are proving to be very difficult. YOu don't understand that?


You rejoice in the governments of the world awarding the choice of vendor rather then the people, i realize that. I'll respect your socialism, but why not try to show an ounce of respect for capitalism. Or are you going to tell me there's never been any corruptio in the English government? Never made any huge bluders? Never any misconduct? never and laughable charades with taxpayer monies?


Yeah, the English are good wth fairy tales.

Posted by: xuniL_z   Posted on: 05/23/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now