On mySimon: Toothbrush Sanitizer
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 33 of 157:
Next »
« Previous
China..
Only with someone like China can Communism work.

Spoken like a man with no clue about the "glories" of communism.

Arthur C. Clark (author of 2001, 2010 and 3001) once wrote that communism is, in fact, the most efficent form of government, however, it is ONLY suited to socialized insects.

The reasons why China's experiment with communism is still on going and hasn't fallen apart like almost EVERY other place it's been tried - they're better at oppressing their people, they've brainwashed their people into believing in it AND they cut off their people from outside news and internet sources. The Chinese are NOT allowed to hear about things going on outside of their country and only hear sanitized versions of stuff going on in their neck of the woods.

And even still, the cry for freedom from oppression surfaces every so often. Remember Tianamen Square?
Posted by: Wolfie2K3   Posted on: 04/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I plugged my WinXP 64 box to the net and all I got was this lousy T-shirt  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
Lucky.. I got a client with constant BSODs/reboots  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
SUUUURRE!!!  vdraken | 04/25/05
You sound like a Microsoft tech..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
yep  azucaro | 04/25/05
You sound like a Linux sociopath.  Altern_z | 04/25/05
Yup  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
ROTFLMAO.. yes, we're all lying...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/26/05
Probably did, at work  FilledOut | 04/25/05
Yes, MS flaws partially pays the bills..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
you can  LinuxHippie | 04/25/05
Thanks..! Luckily, others had the same problem..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
What's on the T-shirt???  cpuguy1 | 04/25/05
I'll tell ya..  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
I just want  Roger Ramjet | 04/25/05
As I said long long ago.  nucrash | 04/25/05
Collusion?  rapson | 04/25/05
sanity check  LinuxHippie | 04/25/05
re: sanity check  Wolfie2K3 | 04/25/05
Collusion?  dimonic | 04/25/05
And...  rapson | 04/25/05
When you dominate xx% of the market....  nucrash | 04/25/05
I believe there is no collusion  osreinstall | 04/25/05
None at all  jheine | 04/25/05
None at all jheine  osreinstall | 04/26/05
All you need is a little common sense Carl  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
No I can't  rapson | 04/25/05
Oh come on Carl!  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
re: And...  Wolfie2K3 | 04/25/05
Collusion  Altern_z | 04/25/05
Subsidize AMD?  ejsecco | 04/25/05
Just don't like AMD getting the short end of the stick.  nucrash | 04/25/05
China..  Wolfie2K3 | 04/25/05
A transition which is the second in our lifetime  lugcalicut | 04/25/05
Simple reason  Rick_K | 04/25/05
takes a while to redo the applications, too.  Anton Philidor | 04/25/05
Try THIRD...  Wolfie2K3 | 04/25/05
Naw.... try  Northwolf | 04/26/05
Why don't i believe?  Macmax77 | 04/25/05
Only ten years late: but Linux had it in 1995  maddoghall | 04/25/05
Maybe, but no one cared.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/25/05
Correction...  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
Movie Goers Cared....Weathermen cared  maddoghall | 04/25/05
Salute to the Maddog  nucrash | 04/25/05
good point, never thought of that, but it makes sense  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
Very rarely do I make a good point, but  nucrash | 04/25/05
Sweet  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
iMac (Original)  nucrash | 04/25/05
Movie Goers Cared....Weathermen cared...Mistaken Beliefs.  walterreads@... | 04/26/05
*Cough WinNT on Alpha cough*  Loverock Davidson | 04/25/05
don't forget MIPS (NT)  LinuxHippie | 04/25/05
Yes...  rpedroche | 04/25/05
bzzzzzt! Wrong, but thanks for playing  Sxooter_z | 04/25/05
Was it 64 bit?  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
(points to Sxooter's post and adds)  rpedroche | 04/25/05
YOu got 1 of the chips wrong!  B.O.F.H. | 04/25/05
older NT ran on Alpha, but very poorly  thabaer | 04/25/05
Sorry  rpedroche | 04/25/05
Windows 4.0  kelkins@... | 04/26/05
Guess again...  Wolfie2K3 | 04/25/05
Hmmm....somthing wrong here....  dsentman@... | 04/27/05
Oh goodie... now what?  Prognosticator | 04/25/05
Now... get ready for this... worms/trojans that start with W64.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Good upgrade.  pinpintalk@... | 04/25/05
Wait for the service packs!  dbrimlow | 04/25/05
buggier is right! just like when win2k came out.  wessonjoe | 04/25/05
While I do agree...  brokenuser | 04/25/05
why 64 bit  BarbieLee | 04/25/05
Clock speed?  AnyOldUser | 04/25/05
Streaming data is CKD all over again  OldFossil | 04/25/05
Sounds interesting...  rpedroche | 04/25/05
Define "streaming"  CobraA1 | 04/25/05
64^2 more ways  zclayton2 | 04/25/05
Who cares if Linux is 256-bit  jogiba@... | 04/25/05
Linux runs its own apps,quite fast and efficiently  muhammadkm | 04/25/05
So?  rpedroche | 04/25/05
That shows all of us how much you know about Linux...  jgmsys@... | 04/25/05
Shows what you know about WINE  nucrash | 04/25/05
Why wait for the law, let's string 'em up NOW!  ralph124c41 | 04/25/05
Thank you  jmarkow1 | 04/25/05
Thank you, Mr. Obvious.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Well...  rapson | 04/25/05
No, the rants wouldn't change  FilledOut | 04/25/05
I will praise Microsoft for one thing  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
True  rapson | 04/25/05
What.... you fail to mention me?  nucrash | 04/25/05
I agree completely  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
I would give examples....  nucrash | 04/25/05
That pendulum swings both ways...  Sabz5150 | 04/25/05
Unix - 64-bit Risc processors  pinpintalk@... | 04/25/05
And there *was* a Windows for RISC processors  rpedroche | 04/25/05
That would had been a huge result....  michael-t | 04/25/05
MIPS but not SPARC  voska | 04/25/05
My apologies  rpedroche | 04/25/05
Do anybody know how Win 64 would support Win 32  muhammadkm | 04/25/05
From MS  quietLee | 04/25/05
Good answer.. I was going to say rubber bands and duct tape..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Won't it be performance sappy  muhammadkm | 04/25/05
Why?  quietLee | 04/25/05
At last: (last again) ms-windows-64  michael-t | 04/25/05
Minor mention of Mac  frabjous | 04/25/05
It is really telling  michael-t | 04/25/05
Just like when they brag about windows 95 back then.  bonifacio.r.jayo@... | 04/25/05
Curious....  ejcrist | 04/25/05
It is interesting to see  michael-t | 04/25/05
Actually  Sxooter_z | 04/25/05
The stupidity starts at the top  nojoeloser | 04/25/05
RE: Curious....Since the latest estimates are that MS Windows is currently  nightshade0143 | 04/25/05
Keeping Windows going  don.chambers@... | 04/25/05
More than 2 programs  osreinstall | 04/25/05
And now the BIG question...  Arkyn1 | 04/25/05
State of readiness  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
And 5 more years ago...  Arkyn1 | 04/25/05
Other than gamers  In_the_end_I_Win | 04/25/05
RE: Other than gamers  nightshade0143 | 04/25/05
That I will disagree with  Michael Kelly | 04/26/05
Multimedia users will benefit  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
Then don't buy it, and don't complain  quietLee | 04/25/05
Speaking of evolution...  quietLee | 04/25/05
Dude...  Sabz5150 | 04/25/05
You're Right  Arkyn1 | 04/25/05
Never?  jheine | 04/25/05
heh  CobraA1 | 04/25/05
Windows is at a disadvantage when converting to 64 bit  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
WRONG  kelkins@... | 04/26/05
Pandoras Box of 64bit  Froggy_z | 04/25/05
Yowza, a "4200 pc network"  nojoeloser | 04/25/05
Do you know how to setup a network???  kelkins@... | 04/26/05
Why debug when 64bit computing is old stuff.  ggstart | 04/25/05
I've actually used it  ron_cleaver@... | 04/25/05
Which version?  Michael Kelly | 04/25/05
All of them  ron_cleaver@... | 04/26/05
Now my AMD creations are fully unleashed  zeusfuse | 04/25/05
Almost there....  jheine | 04/25/05
You can always tell when Apple is ready to launch a new OS  casbo | 04/25/05
RE: You can always tell when Apple is ready to launch a new OS  nightshade0143 | 04/25/05
I will buy to try only. For now.. Mission critical still on Linux  beli0135 | 04/25/05
Mission Critical on Linux???  John Zern | 04/25/05
oh really?  Sxooter_z | 04/25/05
RE: Mission Critical on Linux???  nightshade0143 | 04/25/05
Surprized ?  michael-t | 04/25/05
64-bit Windows is worthless  Guy Fawkes | 04/25/05
Yeah yeah yeah  quietLee | 04/25/05
Memory  lgordonj | 04/25/05
Moore's law is just around the bend  CobraA1 | 04/25/05
I agree  ron_cleaver@... | 04/26/05
Cause: Drivers  hosamaly6@... | 04/28/05
64-bit Windows  puppadave | 04/25/05
Windows crashes  quietLee | 04/25/05
There is much to what the box doesn't perform to  FilledOut | 04/25/05
windows-64 it's as good as  michael-t | 04/25/05
The Greatest Question...  walterreads@... | 04/26/05
Is 128 bit Windows only 18 months away?  bruce_h27 | 04/26/05
Bruce...  mabricen | 04/26/05
For 64-bit DBMS like SQL2005 it is great news.  pelsql | 04/26/05
Any version of Windows is really .....  Reverend MacFellow | 04/27/05
Whatever...  blackbelt_jones | 04/27/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement