On mySimon: iHome Portable Speaker System for iPod
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
Adobe is static, Macromedia is dynamic
I've had to fix way too much GoLive code to have any sympathy
for GoLive users.

The workflow from Fireworks to Dreamweaver produces
fundamentally superior output code by comparison with the
Photoshop [to ImageReady] to GoLive workflow, because
Fireworks is designed to accommodate design of dynamic
pages.

Macromedia has been pushign for dynamic (i.e., purely
digitally delivered) design for years. Adobe really only
understands static design. SVG is cool as far as it goes, but it's
nowhere near Flash in terms of capabilities.
Posted by: escoles@...   Posted on: 04/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Developers that want cross platform solutions will stick with Adobe.  DonnieBoy | 04/18/05
I'm puzzled: Exactly what about Macromedia is NOT x-platform?  escoles@... | 04/19/05
They wanted FLASH period PDF is trash.  jimk_z | 04/18/05
Adobe is static, Macromedia is dynamic  escoles@... | 04/19/05
Expect higher prices for Macromedia products  CHoffla | 04/19/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here