On last.fm: Lollapalooza 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Read the content of the last link, before you lie again
chrichton99 stated "The 64-bit .NET Framework will be available first or second quater 2004 as part of the Whidbey (Visual Studio.NET 2004) release."

Do you have a link to that information or do you work at Microsoft?

I also remember that Microsoft also promised that the next release after Window2000 server would be named ".NET", that .NET would be included in the 64bit Window2003, that "Longhorn" would be released Mid 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and now they are say it will be 3 years away - 2006.

chrichton99 wrote: " ASP.NET is completely browser independent. I don't know what you're talking about here.".

A webservice can provide a webbased browser interface, but it can also provide the user with client side application, most of which are supposed to run in a secure sandboxed enviroment.
Sun and IBM Java SE JVMs provide this, but how secure is .NET when it it based on applications such as winforms etc?


More lies repeated by chrichton99 "Strangely enough, Java oriented companies, such as Middleware Company must be lying also!"

Real Truth on TMC Java Pet Store
* TMC have apologized for a flawed exercise http://www.middlewarecompany.com/j2eedotnetbench/message.shtml
* Microsoft-funded effort Only Microsoft has opportunity for tuning
* Distorted figures against J2EE
Used 2 year old J2EE architecture - No CMP 2.0
No use of JDK 1.4 Many more

READ before you repeat more lies.
http://www.javapassion.com/j2ee/SunShootout_speakernoted.pdf
Posted by: David Mohring   Posted on: 12/18/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Java code compiled by GNU GCC  David Mohring | 12/18/03
Native Java code is neat...  prime21 | 12/18/03
GCC's GJC compiles Java code to native binary  David Mohring | 12/18/03
Of course...  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Does the OS and application come free with .NET?  David Mohring | 12/18/03
Hey now...  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Crap...  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Read the content of the last link, before you lie again  David Mohring | 12/18/03
What's the suggestion here?  IT_User | 12/18/03
Very cool...  prime21 | 12/18/03
Teeheehee  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Not necessarily true - You need to be careful ...  Plain Logic | 12/18/03
Funny headline: what about Microsoft?  marksashton | 12/18/03
Even funnier...  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
True. In the case of Websphere: Linux+Websphere=MUCHO$$$$  marksashton | 12/18/03
Yes, IT costs  IT_User | 12/18/03
( Four Stroke + Ford Pinto )  David Mohring | 12/18/03
The math statement is true  IT_User | 12/18/03
Explanation  Not average Joe | 12/18/03
What's funny?  IT_User | 12/18/03
IMHO...  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Microsoft advocate's lack of competency or integrity?  David Mohring | 12/18/03
Easy now dog  chrichton99 | 12/18/03
Ya right  balsover | 12/19/03
Hey lets be equal here  John Zern | 12/20/03
If it were not Redhat it might be interesting  balsover | 12/19/03
In defense of RedHat (not that they should need it)  Richard Flude | 01/19/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc