On CBS MoneyWatch: 29 Fees We Hate to Pay
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
spam magnet
But that was not his assertion at all. He said that he used MS (without specify what that meant) and that since he quit, his spam problem went away. That may be completely true.

If, by MS, he meant Hotmail, that would seem reasonable. If, by MS, he meant an entire MS system including Windows, Hotmail, etc., it still seems reasonable. Either of those situations would reflect an accurate, albeit ambiguous use of his assertion. He did not at any point say that all MS products cause spam.

It would be a leap in reasoning to say that MS per se is related to spam, but it is equally a leap in reasoning to say that he asserted that it was.

Interestingly, Microsoft just took major steps to combat spam. They were largely effective, and a Hotmail mailbox I have that used to receive hundreds of spams a day is now down to a trickle. That does not mean that it will hold up in the long run, but I do suspect that Microsoft's actions make the spam problem worse as a whole.

Several years ago, MS took action to get rid of spam in Hotmail. They went from having no spam controls to having some. Since it's far easier for spammers to target Hotmail than to target most domains (they can guess email addresses all day long and get many of them right. Bob1234 will probably be a real address at Hotmail but not one at most ramdom domains) spammers will learn Hotmail's rules and change their strategy.

It used to be before Hotmail made that change years ago that most spam messages were sent to a large number or undisclosed recipients. When MS implemented its spam tools, spammers learned that they have to send out each spam addressed directly to each recipient. That ultimately made it harder for folks besides MS to control spam.

That does not by any means suggest that Microsoft should not have taken such an action. It was necessary. But it did exacerbate the overall problem.
Posted by: wresnick   Posted on: 12/15/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Get a rope! (NT)  voska | 12/11/03
Wooooooohoooooo!!!!!  master of illusion | 12/11/03
That is an insult....  James T. Kirk | 12/12/03
SPAM  Sunny Jalolly | 12/11/03
the government acts in the public interest  r7di697 | 12/12/03
But,  Update victim | 12/12/03
MS is a SPAM Magnet  amigatec | 12/12/03
Um.... excuse me, Mr.Troll? Spam is OS impartial.....  James T. Kirk | 12/12/03
You are SO right  Update victim | 12/12/03
Yes excuse you!!!  amigatec | 12/12/03
You can not insult a penis, the brain is to small  boatelc | 12/14/03
Which brain did the typing?  graphix_z | 12/15/03
I do not need to be excused  James T. Kirk | 12/15/03
A bit of a flaw in your assertion  Sunny Jalolly | 12/12/03
spam magnet  wresnick | 12/15/03
It's About TIME!!!  JimWit | 12/12/03
Jail is extreme  SteveProgrammer | 12/12/03
"Has anyone lost money or property?" You're kidding, right???  James T. Kirk | 12/12/03
Fraud can be a felony  Sunny Jalolly | 12/12/03
Spoken like a true Spammer...  BitTwiddler | 12/12/03
Harm ?  Update victim | 12/12/03
Jeeze Steve  larryisp | 12/15/03
Opt-Out Links - Yeah, Right!  cpuguy1 | 12/14/03
Stopping SPAM is real easy.  homercat | 12/15/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here