MS, IBM and Oracle have no relational products
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
Relational Databases
d0ti5 | 02/24/05
|
|
IBM theory vs practice
__howard__ | 02/24/05
|
RDB History: IBM project started in 1973
mikew_z | 02/25/05
|
|
Oh yes they do!
neverhome | 02/24/05
|
|
Bull
jnonneman | 02/24/05
|
|
Since Codds 12 is the definition of Relational...
msalomon | 02/24/05
|
|
mathematical reason
__howard__ | 02/24/05
|
Metric system
d0ti5 | 02/25/05
|
|
No not relational
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
By what definition?
Shift4SMS | 02/24/05
|
|
A common misapprehension
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
if ignorance is bliss, you're a happy fool
cicuta | 02/24/05
|
|
RDBMS Defined...
neverhome | 02/24/05
|
|
Non definition
msalomon | 02/24/05
|
|
Okay, let me shed MORE light here
neverhome | 02/24/05
|
|
the blind leading the blind
cicuta | 02/24/05
|
|
Interchangeability
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
I fully agree
Shift4SMS | 02/25/05
|
|
You are a foolish man to jump to such conclusions
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
Is it a DBMS or an RDBMS?
careed | 02/25/05
|
|
What are you talking about?
kevin@... | 02/24/05
|
|
More info on "relational" db
__howard__ | 02/24/05
|
|
Many thanks your Lordship
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
They are basically relational.
flipper35 | 02/24/05
|
|
"Basically relational"? you cannot have it both ways
msalomon | 02/24/05
|
|
Awwww.....
neverhome | 02/24/05
|
|
SQL Standard
CAPCAN | 02/24/05
|
|
(nt) Clueless
d_jedi | 02/24/05
|
|
MS IBM have no relational DB's?
Terfenol_D | 02/24/05
|
|
Can set a primary key
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
Not relational?
CodeBubba | 02/24/05
|
|
Not really ignorant
__howard__ | 02/24/05
|
|
Unfortunately you are the one that is ignorant
jorwell | 02/25/05
|
|
good to see ms going back to the drawing board
liskanich | 02/24/05
|
|
Back to the drawing board...
d0ti5 | 02/24/05
|
|
MySQL
Chad_z | 02/24/05
|
|
MySQL is one of the worst
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
I beg to differ
ngon | 02/24/05
|
|
noticeable degradation sounds like improper configuration of sql
liskanich | 02/24/05
|
|
I had One
nucrash | 02/24/05
|
|
That's the problem, you need more hardware to get the same performance
DonnieBoy | 02/24/05
|
|
Never? Really?
cicuta | 02/24/05
|
|
The depressing thing about Open Source DBMS
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
What the hell is wrong with SQL
nucrash | 02/24/05
|
|
A hell of a lot
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
SQL just a high level programming language
voska | 02/24/05
|
|
So your problem is understrnading of the theory ?
michael-t | 02/24/05
|
|
For some applications, think BerkeleyDB. It is the absolute fastest.
DonnieBoy | 02/24/05
|
|
Performance is only a tiny part of the problem
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
Well, I could not agree more, but we will be living with SQL for a while.
DonnieBoy | 02/24/05
|
|
WHAT?
doe_z | 02/24/05
|
|
DEFINE RELATIONAL
cicuta | 02/24/05
|
|
You can read this up for yourself
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
Stop whining and do something about it
criderja | 02/24/05
|
|
Don't waste your time responding to this guy
kribor_z | 02/24/05
|
|
Expert??
jorwell | 02/24/05
|
|
Well this is something to useful to learn
pelsql | 03/14/05
|
|
A few things
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
Quite right
Chad_z | 02/24/05
|
|
Thanks Chad
xsylvainhoule@... | 02/25/05
|
|
Per processor pricing is silly
voska | 02/24/05
|
|
I agree, but, it is another way of making more $
TechType | 02/24/05
|
|
Hmmm, can you say multi-core,
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/24/05
|
|
Can you say IBM???
nucrash | 02/24/05
|
|
Let me help you with the topic...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/24/05
|
|
Watch them charge you per core
voska | 02/24/05
|
|
Nope, MS said they won't.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/24/05
|
|
I will belive that...
Patrick Jones | 02/24/05
|
|
Believe it, this is the way it is actually done
pelsql | 03/14/05
|
|
That's not binding though
voska | 02/25/05
|
|
It was the future 3 yers ago.
B.O.F.H. | 02/24/05
|
|
Per user licensing
JanglinJack | 02/24/05
|
|
That'd be per server
voska | 02/25/05
|
|
I don't agree ...
mwagner@... | 02/24/05
|
|
I can see per sever pricing
voska | 02/25/05
|
|
Wrong understanding of MS SQL Per processor licence
pelsql | 03/14/05
|
|
Closer analogy
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
Per Processor Licensing
gbed | 02/24/05
|
|
Per Processor Licensing
arnold_walker@... | 02/24/05
|
|
Extremely Vendor Specific
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
MS says multi core is multi processor
appletonjim | 02/24/05
|
|
Huh?
rapson | 02/24/05
|
|
I know, Oracle doesn't however
voska | 02/25/05
|
|
Also think PostgreSQL. It is improving fast.
DonnieBoy | 02/24/05
|
|
Yes, absolutely
Chad_z | 02/24/05
|
|
Competition is always good ...
mwagner@... | 02/24/05
|
|
Yep...
brble | 02/24/05
|
|
$3000+ *per processor*?!?!? Time to think Postgres or Mysql!
kensys | 02/24/05
|
|
I'll say!
CobraA1 | 02/25/05
|
|
Pay less work more a less expensive proposition ?
pelsql | 03/14/05
|
|
Wizard of failing Magics
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
BALONEY! Microsoft didnt start it.
daver_z | 02/24/05
|
|
SQL Server v. Oracle 10g
tenryuu | 02/24/05
|
|
I Disagree
robert.hart@... | 02/24/05
|
|
Can you explain
michael-t | 02/24/05
|
|
SQL Server vs Oracle
JRidge | 02/26/05
|
|
Not always the same experience....
pelsql | 03/14/05
|
|
oracle is great
NemesisNL | 02/24/05
|
|
Oracle is starting to suck
NotMSUser | 02/24/05
|
|
Whats the alternative?
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
The Scorpion and The Turtle
shadomn | 02/24/05
|
|
Been there dun that. - Access vs Paradox
jhawklyn@... | 02/24/05
|
|
Split MS Apps from MS OS
gordon@... | 02/24/05
|
|
Who won the 2000 election
seosamh_z | 02/24/05
|
|
"We believe the packaging and licensing is a feature of the product."
linuxoverwindows | 02/24/05
|
|
Pope Is Gonna Croak: Any Bets On When?
itanalyst | 02/24/05
|
|
Stay INSIDE - for your own safety
j.m.galvin | 02/24/05
|
|
Considering From A Religous Standpoint
itanalyst | 02/24/05
|
|
Struggling to work this into the topic...
brble | 02/24/05
|
|
Easy
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
You're a sad individual
seosamh_z | 02/24/05
|
|
There are many sad individuals Joey
Jeff Spicoli | 02/24/05
|
|
At the risk of feeding the troll...
bill@... | 02/25/05
|
|
5 figure donation. Sure. Right.
Beechcraft | 02/24/05
|
|
It amazes me
seosamh_z | 02/24/05
|
|
Microsoft
tonyarm@... | 02/24/05
|
|
SQL son, SQL.
seosamh_z | 02/24/05
|
|
Im suprised...
jdahs@... | 02/24/05
|
|
The Evil Gnomes of Redmond
btkatt | 02/25/05
|
|
There are Alternatives
viswakarma | 02/24/05
|
|
No one has enough revenue
bjbrock | 02/24/05
|
|
Cheaper than Free?
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
Welcome home!
seosamh_z | 02/25/05
|
|
Well sure. When they realized they couldn't
bjbrock | 02/24/05
|
|
Microsoft may not defeat Oracle in Database Price War
taye_omo@... | 02/24/05
|
|
MS DATABASE
zdnethead | 02/25/05
|
|
Would Someone Please Explain to Me...
bill@... | 02/25/05
|
|
Because their small business
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
Post-Relational
zielpunkt | 02/25/05
|
|
Pros and Cons
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
|
Whatever . . .
Sheeva | 03/01/05
|
|
2 words - Corporate Merger
awhite@... | 04/17/05
|
When you transition from your existing Red Hat environment to SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, you can recognize dramatic cost savings, perhaps as much 50%
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
