Group wants P2P files to pay

TalkBack 24 of 30:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Magnolia

"""Instead of containing a song or movie itself, the file would set up a process that automatically delivers files in the right format and potentially triggers an automatic payment system that could be changed moment to moment by the content distributor.....

So tell me,what makes sense is to first come up with a standard known as 'copyfriendly.This is already a part of the 'digital utility.

Communication of a 'copyfriendly ''copy (or record) is as well part of that standard within the ''digital utility.

No new product,or manufacture is neccesary from the content distributer or other wise.

Since ,from here,..I KNOW this to be true..what I dont know from that digital utility,is the relationship between the 'person involved,except when a criteria of ''copyright,or liscence''creeps into the conversation.


You make the mistake of devaluing 'person (on the part of the patron) to create 'status quo on the bearing of legality - because this is what your sucking on right now,the ability to deligate person out of the rhetoric of 'liscencing.

Again-this is the 'safe relationship discos,artists,technocrats,and patronizers can take. Your only premise for this is the existance of a quick connection,comparitevily speaking a ''collect call''in wich the person cannot refuse the substance of the conversation being so.

The risk side is the fact that :

1.There is no fair-use set up within law that denotes a relationship of person,within usage of copyrighted materials.

2. There is nothing within present day copyright law,DMCA,nor Electronic Theft Acts wich actually tells of an artists,or anybodies for that matter - asthetic performance of digital works.(performance).

3.Nothing within Copyright law makes illegal a copyright wich has 'copy as a feature of the copyright,to the person of use of it.

4.None of the #2 describes that any 'liscence by law can be created in wich usury is denoted of the law.If it is usury,copyright law has nothing to do with what is being described as a legal reference.


''so tell me what device your playing it on and we'll send you the file'''.


I can see that this is as contextual as the subject title within my talkback here.

A.To make copy a 'feature of the copyrighted work then.
DVD copies,DVD Product
Movie copies,Movie Product
Music copies,Music Product

B.To make communication a feature of the copyrighted work.

DVD performance communication(s) Streaming,file
Movie performance communication(s) streaming,file
Music performance communications(s)streaming,file

C.To make a work rationaly used as the performance of it.

DVD - part of the product
Movies -part of the product
Music - part of the product

D.Device to device - this is somehow a real jolly big whoop.


One the digital utility is 'standardized by reference.Of course not 'all relationships of works are going to have the same 'features.

And THIS is where one can see the blatant disregard for self respect in individual person these conglomerates have.

name the property the digital utility can provide - name the copyrighted work that can be used for the utility.Create the limits of wich the work(s) can take,and go and do.

But you cannot make agreements with no person .
Consumers only have patronage.The only functioanlity the rhetoric of liscence has is that 'collect - no questions asked,of wich the contributer of the work forwards the connection and does not hang up the phone.

The difference is a 'digital receipt,describing digital feature,detailing digital function,then releasing the product to the consumer.

The consumer needs no further relationship to seller,copyright holder or any further collaboration considering the sale. The person,personal information,location of use whatever need any attention from the seller.


The idea being the product,is 'warranted to a 'person of use.And this 'fair-use to the person of use is spelled out by hanging up the phone,and saying later on.

-just talking.(c ..The seller need only to be paid,and tell the patron to 'get lost.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 12/10/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now