On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 91:
Next »
« Previous
A couple of points
1. Linux 1.0 was released in 1991, 2.0 was released in 1996. Was it a full blown desktop operating system even in 1996? Absolutely not. It wasn't even intended to be one. It was a school project back then. And even Linux 2.6 is not a full blown desktop OS, it's just a kernel. You still need X11 and full featured desktop managers to be a considered desktop OS. You'd have to fast forward to at least 2000 to get to even close to having all the parts necessary to even be seriously considered for the desktop, and 2002 before it reached the that level. And that was with mostly volunteer support.

2. Read what I said. Novell only got into the game in 2004. Until then there was no company with that kind of advertising and development dollars to back up a desktop distribution. All others who developed for Linux made it clear they were developing for the server, and you can see where their market share has gone.

3. There IS more than 1% in 2005, and that is WITHOUT the advertising money or OEM contracts to back it up. That should tell you something.

4. Oh right. You're just flaming, so why bother explaining things?
Posted by: Michael Kelly   Posted on: 02/15/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I guess people will pay for water  Roger Ramjet | 02/15/05
Is it your purpose just to be the ...  ShadeTree | 02/15/05
RE: Is it your purpose just to be the ...  richdave | 02/15/05
Ever heard of Hardened Gentoo?  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
linux  cypressbob | 02/17/05
If you were me  Roger Ramjet | 02/16/05
Why wouldn't they?  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
RE: Why wouldn't they?  richdave | 02/15/05
That's a pretty bold statement  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
Small fry  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
RE: Small Fry  weirving2@... | 02/15/05
You missed it  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
You made a point!  Traveler545220 | 02/15/05
Realllyyyy!!??  richdave | 02/15/05
There already is  darkmoonman | 02/15/05
Paying for support.  vdraken | 02/15/05
90% of which market?  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
Huh???  Tommy Gun | 02/15/05
A couple of points  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
Do you own MS shares or...  Eerikki | 02/15/05
"Don't hate me because I'm popular."  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Tinkers more like  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
What can the Penguin do for you?  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
The King's lacky  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
Fine, if you want to play it that way....  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
More than "just another OS"  Anti_Zealot | 02/15/05
Have you  lengua99 | 02/15/05
I doubt that  houndgb | 02/15/05
RE: I guess people will pay for water  jkotan | 02/15/05
leapfrogging Novell?  doh123 | 02/15/05
I don't think Red Hat is worried about Novell.  bjbrock | 02/15/05
Additionally, I have to wonder why Novell  bjbrock | 02/15/05
How many ways can you say Monopoly?  PCcritic | 02/15/05
No such thing  YukonRay | 02/15/05
The reasons for Novell's losing streak  bjbrock | 02/15/05
Monopolies are natural, but not legal  psuedostratified | 02/15/05
Excellent Post (nt).  doe_z | 02/15/05
Of course they're legal; so are oligopolies.  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Good point, but...  psuedostratified | 02/15/05
Nice post but....  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
Nice counter post, but...  psuedostratified | 02/15/05
You are so wrong  Yehuda Mann | 02/15/05
Well then  lengua99 | 02/15/05
I can say, "MS beat Novell"  houndgb | 02/15/05
Good post.  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Let's be real here....  AckItsMe2 | 02/15/05
Are you kidding?  johns_z | 02/15/05
Get educated!  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
Ok, now for the real world  houndgb | 02/15/05
Windows Mounts Too....  siege@... | 02/15/05
Do you cook ? or just alway go to the restaurant ?  tom123_z | 02/16/05
FC3 vs SUSE and MS-Windows, vs Apple  Traveler545220 | 02/15/05
optional read. (This is knit-picking)  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
FC3 vs SUSE and MS-Windows, vs Apple  labarker | 02/15/05
Compatibility?  seosamh_z | 02/15/05
Apple is not --not really-- a hardware company.  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
you are wrong on SuSE 9.1  doh123 | 02/15/05
Proprietary RedHat Linux?  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Not a real lock-in.  doe_z | 02/15/05
Home-made operating systems.  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
A little looking is all it takes  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
Powerhouses.  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
It looks like your definition of lock-in...  Michael Kelly | 02/15/05
Confusing.  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
Always seeking lock-in.  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Last I checked...  doe_z | 02/15/05
What?  Richard Flude | 02/15/05
RedHat and proprietary  Anton Philidor | 02/15/05
Where's the lock-in?  Richard Flude | 02/15/05
Red Hat catching SuSE catching Microsoft?  sjworth@... | 02/15/05
More gaming companies are looking to Linux  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
From what I've read  IT Scion | 02/15/05
not really  doh123 | 02/15/05
Depends on a few factors. What is High-end anyway?  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
RedHat fighting back...  doe_z | 02/15/05
Linux Vs Microsoft  RichmondGiant | 02/15/05
Maybe you don't realise why Mac's cost US$3,000.00  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
Linux no Threat  Olde Foxx | 02/15/05
I disagree Linux belongs on the Desktop  Krazyken39 | 02/15/05
Well, it's all about ...  jrniccolls@... | 02/15/05
You use the term, 'Flaw,' loosely.  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
Catching up to Microsoft  Axeman3813 | 02/15/05
You can play your games!  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
I thought I was wrong but I was Mistaken {DirectX support}  The King's Servant | 02/15/05
Right on!  darkmoonman | 02/15/05
Surely not!  Richard Flude | 02/15/05
Linux is growing in popularity  Pieintheface | 02/15/05
Linux should go up  Joshivs | 02/15/05
A few comments.  doe_z | 02/17/05
Linux should go up  Chasura | 08/15/05
Right on!  Chasura | 08/15/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here