On CHOW: How to brine your holiday turkey
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 32 of 93:
Next »
« Previous
Are you reading the same article ?
I don't remember it ever says anything about the compromised was done via a physical touching of the machine (developer). All it says, and I quoted:

"The attacker gained access to one of the systems by compromising a developer's computer and installing a program to sniff out the characters typed on the developer's keyboard, according to a postmortem analysis..."

Okay, so this is how the hacker got the password into the Develoment System as a DEVELOPER. But then, the big flaw is then it was then able to (and I quote again) "...Using the September flaw, the attacker gained owner privileges on Klecker. This is frequently referred to as "owning" the system. The flaw--in a part of the kernel that manages memory--allows only users that already have access to the system to raise their privileges. Such flaws are less critical than vulnerabilities that give an outside attacker access to a server and so are fixed less quickly...."

I believed that the problem here is that these 'Less Critical Flaw' is NOT looked at as careful as one would believed that they are or else there wouldn't be a compromise.

It's easy to hack into a user's desktop system via different ways (social engineering hack, etc), but Linux's strength was supposed to be on the Servers. What this flaw tells me is that if I have an inside person then I could be in for a big problem. Which, according to all security/business reports, are the #1 cause of security/thief for any business.

Spin as you will, this just says that Linux is finally growing up and are now facing the same problems that MS has been for years and that the microscrope is only going to be right on top of them.
Posted by: JJ_z   Posted on: 12/02/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What's going on with these attacks  FilledOut | 12/01/03
because they can? (nt)  ryusen | 12/01/03
This is what I've been saying all along..  d_jedi | 12/02/03
Hey all you MS shills (No_Ax, LMaxwell,...) heres your chance ...  Plain Logic | 12/01/03
No need for flames  toadlife | 12/01/03
Exactly ...  Ardian Daka | 12/02/03
btw...  toadlife | 12/01/03
For me...  Cardinal_Bill | 12/01/03
For me...  none none | 12/01/03
Try OS X  Len Rooney | 12/01/03
Better GUI?  balsover | 12/02/03
The command line's still there in Linux.  Damon K | 12/02/03
and me..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
btw...  mtifo@... | 12/02/03
Both  dscherf | 12/02/03
Agreed..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Why I prefer Linux  voska | 12/02/03
Good reasons  dscherf | 12/02/03
Apps..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Thanx, I'll take look  voska | 12/02/03
What's to flame? Flaming is for children.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/03
Nice to have a completely open system, without anything hidden.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Of interest is that it required a *physical* compromise of a machine plus..  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03
bottom line, it WAS COMPROMISED!!!!  DO_z | 12/01/03
what's your point?  stephen732@... | 12/01/03
FALSE!  IT_User | 12/02/03
Where did it say physical access?  default user_z | 12/02/03
Nevermind  default user_z | 12/02/03
Only on X86 machines  voska | 12/02/03
I call bovine manure...  Damon K | 12/02/03
If he had physical access  voska | 12/02/03
Are you reading the same article ?  JJ_z | 12/02/03
ZDNet never gives the full story.  Jomo_z | 12/02/03
It's simple.  Damon K | 12/02/03
Where's the linux advocates?  DO_z | 12/01/03
fanatics  myndlon@... | 12/02/03
Who said Linux was bullet-proof?  Damon K | 12/02/03
Ok, Neal Stephenson...  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
Ok, Neal Stephenson...  balsover | 12/02/03
Agreed. Stephenson's fun, but...  Damon K | 12/02/03
I hear ya, dude..  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
Mmmm.... Donut.....  Damon K | 12/02/03
Just one nit, db  IT_User | 12/02/03
*Now*  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
It's only bulletproof...  msdead | 12/02/03
consistancy of your words...  ryusen | 12/02/03
physical security....  zoltrac | 12/01/03
Nothing new...nothing is 100% secure  jimk_z | 12/01/03
Exactly correct  d_jedi | 12/02/03
Partially Correct  bit_rot | 12/02/03
Subject correct  IT_User | 12/02/03
I agree with "nothing is 100% secure" but that's about all  Richard Flude | 12/02/03
re  jimk_z | 12/02/03
Software Review Is Useless  TEBushmaker | 12/01/03
You miss half the point of Reviews...  Root User | 12/02/03
Security  crocd | 12/02/03
what can be gained?  myndlon@... | 12/02/03
Broken Style Sheets, Broken phone Battery  Nigel Johnstone | 12/02/03
Wheres the hole?  OhMyGosh | 12/02/03
Blame ZDNet for that.  Damon K | 12/02/03
OK, class, pop quiz....  mlindl | 12/02/03
Believe it or not it is a Windows Platform  Squawkbox | 12/02/03
OS/2?  archerjoe | 12/02/03
OS/Who?  balsover | 12/02/03
I know one...  gypkap@... | 12/02/03
OS/2 is close, OS/400 by IBM  nucrash | 12/02/03
I got it.. Pick me.. Pick me..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
VMS  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/02/03
I've never heard of  rkadowns | 12/02/03
One More  slopoke | 12/02/03
It's all good.  rkadowns | 12/02/03
Yup Yup  voska | 12/02/03
Yup Yup Yup  rkadowns | 12/02/03
Another M$ shill rears his brainless head.  NoB$ | 12/02/03
Newsflash!  IT_User | 12/02/03
More details for those who want em  voska | 12/02/03
Good Info  michael-t | 12/02/03
Run in circles...scream and shout!  Cardinal_Bill | 12/02/03
real point is !!  nite_w0lf | 12/02/03
Yup..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Big deal. No software is completely secure - Linux included  marksashton | 12/02/03
Ignore the Zealots...  ryusen | 12/02/03
Linux Kernel Writers should talk to their UNIX Friends  michael-t | 12/02/03
It isn't us! We swear!  msdead | 12/02/03
Sloppy source movement strikes again  gklay | 12/02/03
Good point (but your headline probably turned people off)  marksashton | 12/02/03
Exactly!  michael-t | 12/02/03
Unanswered Questions  michael-t | 12/02/03
Keeps M$ shills from going crazy  NoB$ | 12/02/03
another security hole!  SteveS_z | 12/02/03
Mandrake 9.2 not affected.  libertyaikido | 12/02/03
Linux flaw  jumby@... | 12/02/03
Just read the tech forums  FilledOut | 12/04/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here