On CNET: Updating your software just got easier
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 93:
Next »
« Previous
For me...
I started out via UNIX. Then dual booted Win3.11 and a release (the name of which escapes me right now) that would only run from CD. I went out and bought a copy of Slackware. I ran that for awhile and then discovered the upgrade process was to install the new version, wiping out what was there. So I bought a copy of RedHat 3.0 because it would do an upgrade without trashing my configuration.

Now as to *BSD releases...at the time, as I recall, they were hard to find, expensive, etc. Even now they're a bit more esoteric than the straight forward Linux distros.

Now I'm thinking hard about switching at least one machine over to OpenBSD, yep I'm a nut about security. And Linux is starting to be to much like Windows...point, click. Love my command line.
Posted by: Cardinal_Bill   Posted on: 12/01/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What's going on with these attacks  FilledOut | 12/01/03
because they can? (nt)  ryusen | 12/01/03
This is what I've been saying all along..  d_jedi | 12/02/03
Hey all you MS shills (No_Ax, LMaxwell,...) heres your chance ...  Plain Logic | 12/01/03
No need for flames  toadlife | 12/01/03
Exactly ...  Ardian Daka | 12/02/03
btw...  toadlife | 12/01/03
For me...  Cardinal_Bill | 12/01/03
For me...  none none | 12/01/03
Try OS X  Len Rooney | 12/01/03
Better GUI?  balsover | 12/02/03
The command line's still there in Linux.  Damon K | 12/02/03
and me..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
btw...  mtifo@... | 12/02/03
Both  dscherf | 12/02/03
Agreed..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Why I prefer Linux  voska | 12/02/03
Good reasons  dscherf | 12/02/03
Apps..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Thanx, I'll take look  voska | 12/02/03
What's to flame? Flaming is for children.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/03
Nice to have a completely open system, without anything hidden.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Of interest is that it required a *physical* compromise of a machine plus..  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03
bottom line, it WAS COMPROMISED!!!!  DO_z | 12/01/03
what's your point?  stephen732@... | 12/01/03
FALSE!  IT_User | 12/02/03
Where did it say physical access?  default user_z | 12/02/03
Nevermind  default user_z | 12/02/03
Only on X86 machines  voska | 12/02/03
I call bovine manure...  Damon K | 12/02/03
If he had physical access  voska | 12/02/03
Are you reading the same article ?  JJ_z | 12/02/03
ZDNet never gives the full story.  Jomo_z | 12/02/03
It's simple.  Damon K | 12/02/03
Where's the linux advocates?  DO_z | 12/01/03
fanatics  myndlon@... | 12/02/03
Who said Linux was bullet-proof?  Damon K | 12/02/03
Ok, Neal Stephenson...  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
Ok, Neal Stephenson...  balsover | 12/02/03
Agreed. Stephenson's fun, but...  Damon K | 12/02/03
I hear ya, dude..  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
Mmmm.... Donut.....  Damon K | 12/02/03
Just one nit, db  IT_User | 12/02/03
*Now*  Delaware Boy | 12/02/03
It's only bulletproof...  msdead | 12/02/03
consistancy of your words...  ryusen | 12/02/03
physical security....  zoltrac | 12/01/03
Nothing new...nothing is 100% secure  jimk_z | 12/01/03
Exactly correct  d_jedi | 12/02/03
Partially Correct  bit_rot | 12/02/03
Subject correct  IT_User | 12/02/03
I agree with "nothing is 100% secure" but that's about all  Richard Flude | 12/02/03
re  jimk_z | 12/02/03
Software Review Is Useless  TEBushmaker | 12/01/03
You miss half the point of Reviews...  Root User | 12/02/03
Security  crocd | 12/02/03
what can be gained?  myndlon@... | 12/02/03
Broken Style Sheets, Broken phone Battery  Nigel Johnstone | 12/02/03
Wheres the hole?  OhMyGosh | 12/02/03
Blame ZDNet for that.  Damon K | 12/02/03
OK, class, pop quiz....  mlindl | 12/02/03
Believe it or not it is a Windows Platform  Squawkbox | 12/02/03
OS/2?  archerjoe | 12/02/03
OS/Who?  balsover | 12/02/03
I know one...  gypkap@... | 12/02/03
OS/2 is close, OS/400 by IBM  nucrash | 12/02/03
I got it.. Pick me.. Pick me..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
VMS  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/02/03
I've never heard of  rkadowns | 12/02/03
One More  slopoke | 12/02/03
It's all good.  rkadowns | 12/02/03
Yup Yup  voska | 12/02/03
Yup Yup Yup  rkadowns | 12/02/03
Another M$ shill rears his brainless head.  NoB$ | 12/02/03
Newsflash!  IT_User | 12/02/03
More details for those who want em  voska | 12/02/03
Good Info  michael-t | 12/02/03
Run in circles...scream and shout!  Cardinal_Bill | 12/02/03
real point is !!  nite_w0lf | 12/02/03
Yup..  FreeBSD | 12/02/03
Big deal. No software is completely secure - Linux included  marksashton | 12/02/03
Ignore the Zealots...  ryusen | 12/02/03
Linux Kernel Writers should talk to their UNIX Friends  michael-t | 12/02/03
It isn't us! We swear!  msdead | 12/02/03
Sloppy source movement strikes again  gklay | 12/02/03
Good point (but your headline probably turned people off)  marksashton | 12/02/03
Exactly!  michael-t | 12/02/03
Unanswered Questions  michael-t | 12/02/03
Keeps M$ shills from going crazy  NoB$ | 12/02/03
another security hole!  SteveS_z | 12/02/03
Mandrake 9.2 not affected.  libertyaikido | 12/02/03
Linux flaw  jumby@... | 12/02/03
Just read the tech forums  FilledOut | 12/04/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline