On CBS MoneyWatch: Dumbest Things You Do With Money
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 77:
Next »
« Previous
You don't know what you're talking about
See, if you - and all of the other people out there that enjoy bashing Microsoft at the drop of a hat - did any research, you would know that XP does NOT have a lock-in, really. If you purchase the Pro version, it does NOT lock itself to your hardware, and the same goes for version sold to corporate clients that will install it automatically on many systems using a site license. When you have the Pro version, you're not required to do ANY kind of activiation, by calling Microsoft or in any other way. I'm sure they'll do the same thing with Office. And, seeing as how 99.9% of the people that use Office do so at work, it will be the same situation for them as well: their IT administrator will set up a site-wide install on their network server, and the application will be installed on every applicable machine in the office automatically - same as can be done with Windows 2000 and Windows XP Pro.

Do some research into the actual situation before pretending you know what you're talking about, please; and the same goes for all of you other Apple and Linux zealots out there. While I have no great love for Microsoft, at least I research the facts rather than just taking the word of the thousands of Microsoft detractors and haters out there, and in this situation I most definitely know the facts: "lock-in" will NOT be an issue AT ALL, in XP, Office, or any future software that has this type of software protection.

Another thing: Microsoft is NOT the only company to use such a copyright protection scheme. High-end audio & graphics software development companies have been doing so for years, and only after they gave up on a HARDWARE lock. Half of my 3D application plugins are locked to the specific hard drive they're installed on, and if I should ever need to install them on a new drive, or should I ever get an entirely new computer, I'll have to email the company, or use an automated online system, to get a new software key. It isn't a big issue at all, and the only time a problem would arise is if the companies in question should go out of business. The few times this has already happened to me, the products have either been purchased by another, competing software company, or the company released the code generator for free to the public domain so it wouldn't be an issue. However, what's the chance that Microsoft will be going out of business any time soon? Keep your silly, immature comments to yourself about this, and realize the truthful answer to this question: NOT BLOODY LIKELY.

Quit your complaining. If you don't like Microsoft's products, don't use them; ignore the standard that has allowed millions of users speaking hundreds, if not thousands, of different languages and dialects to communicate with each other freely and easily. Go download/purchase StarOffice or Corel's WordPerfect Suite, both of which are capable products (and both of which support the Office formats at one level or another, though StarOffice's support for the new versions & formatting of Office documents is beyond flaky), and crawl back under your rock, or back into your little computer technology fantasy world. The rest of us - the rest of the world - will continue to use the products - Microsoft's Office suite of applications - that satisfy our needs, have good support, and which are eternally compatible with the products just about everyone else uses - without complaining. Should Office every fail to meet my needs, I will use something else. However, when it comes down to needing a capable word processing or spreadsheet software, I have yet to find anything that can beat Word or Excel in ease of use, stability (the only stability problem I ever had w/ either is when Adobe Acrobat installed the useless Reader plugin in Office without my permission, and uninstalling it eliminated any issues - every other plugin I've used, such as the great Jaws PDF Creator - better and more useful than Adobe's applications & plugins for the same purposes) has worked just fine.

And on that note, farewell. I hope you, and all of the other detractors out there, will one day realize how lucky the computer world is that someone like Microsoft came along to standardize the way we communicate with each other using this wonderful computer technology. While they're not perfect, and there are some things I'd love to see done differently, I think they've done a damned fine job of making sure I can, for example, send this message and know it will get to where it's supposed to go (no, I'm not saying they invented the TCP/IP standards, nor the Internet, but they've handled making sure I can use it easily better than anyone else out there, including Netscape, which is less than dead any more).

//________________________
Regards,
- Nick Robalik
Digital.Soapbox
High-End Design & Development
http://www.digital-soapbox.com
nick@digital-soapbox.com
Posted by: info@...   Posted on: 12/02/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

They may have been dragged kicking and screaming, but...  Michael Kelly | 12/01/03
Yes, 3rd party apps are good, but you can also replace MS Office  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
A rock and a hard place  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Another PR piece  NoB$ | 12/01/03
We will see, any royalties would kill this.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
More MS T&A  Len Rooney | 12/01/03
There won't be a big uptake for Office 2003  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
You are right, do NOT use the add-on crap.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Message has been deleted.  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
You don't know what you're talking about  info@... | 12/02/03
No WinXPPro registration? You're kidding, right?  Donald B. Stinnette | 12/02/03
He has to be kidding!  rmkjr@... | 12/02/03
MS formats  nite_w0lf | 12/01/03
In a word -- HUGE  Mike Cox | 12/01/03
Nursey says...  AbsolutelyNot | 12/01/03
"My MCSE's will back me up" !?! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03
he might be right if...  in-DUH-vidual | 12/02/03
Wow  info@... | 12/02/03
Double WOW!  in-DUH-vidual | 12/02/03
XML and 'Competitive Disadvantage'  michael-t | 12/01/03
Too true Mikey  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
Punishment for MS  michael-t | 12/01/03
Punishment for WHAT?  info@... | 12/02/03
How about for breaking the law?  WhoIsDaMan | 12/02/03
Short history lesson  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 12/02/03
Scared of Competition ...  michael-t | 12/01/03
But it means nothing unless...  KeithRisler | 12/01/03
I don't think it's an issue.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
NOT an issue?? History means nothing????  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
interoperability  voska | 12/01/03
Water is wet; the Pope is Catholic; _Ax the M$hill is lying...  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03
Competition as it should be.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
What exactly is the definition of Monopoly?  voska | 12/01/03
Who knows???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Monopoly Point  AbsolutelyNot | 12/01/03
So the very first contract...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Not only that  voska | 12/01/03
I'm confused...  MalumRegnat | 12/01/03
at what point did MS become a monopoly?  WhoIsDaMan | 12/02/03
Of course competition is good...  John Le'Brecage | 12/01/03
So you are saying that...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
No son..that's NOT what he was saying..and you know it  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
I'm still confused...  MalumRegnat | 12/01/03
That's too far in the opposite direction...  John Le'Brecage | 12/01/03
Good points, but is it true?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
my thoughts  voska | 12/01/03
As much as I expected...  John Le'Brecage | 12/01/03
I'll take exception  IT_User | 12/01/03
A few comments...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 12/02/03
Definition of "monopoly"  Spoon Jabber | 12/01/03
Don't know what you're referring to..  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
I've been trying to decide whether...  John Le'Brecage | 12/01/03
John, you know better.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Yes he does...perhaps he MEANT what he said  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
Hmmm, curious how you answer for him.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Exactly? Do you really mean exactly???  John Le'Brecage | 12/01/03
Then why...  zkiwi | 12/01/03
Everyone has an opinion...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Wrong (yet again!)  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/01/03
Whatever you say...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
Looking does not equal being able to change  zkiwi | 12/01/03
Yes, competition is good.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Nice Information  michael-t | 12/01/03
I'm glad you agree with me. Thanks...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/03
And here I was thinking that...  zkiwi | 12/01/03
I think you should read the article  zkiwi | 12/01/03
Remaining confused...  MalumRegnat | 12/01/03
Think of the time it's taken to get "there", ok?  zkiwi | 12/01/03
You're so full of it that it spews out your mouth, Axis...  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03
What's behind Microsoft's Office moves? The same movers  michael-t | 12/01/03
Microsoft's biggest competitor is Microsoft  Anton Philidor | 12/01/03
You've defined the challenge  IT_User | 12/01/03
Not a new challenge  Anton Philidor | 12/02/03
Yep, a new challenge  IT_User | 12/02/03
Good points  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 12/02/03
Microsoft encourages complementary success.  Anton Philidor | 12/02/03
... and I WAS RIGHT. MONTHS ago ALL the M$hills pooh-poohed the idea ...  dicktaurus@... | 12/01/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline