On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
Yes, good point about slavery and objectivity here...
It may be the prevailing attitude today that slavery is wrong and that it is not right to "own" people. But it wasn't always the case.

I'm sure a slaveowner would object to any discussion regarding abolising slaves or the slave trade. They've got a vested interest, and arguing with slaveowners is pointless no matter how wrong the owners' position is. The slaveowners' arguments might go along the lines of expecting to "..recoup the time and money they spent on THEIR PROPERTY." In other words, ill-gained profit.

No_Axe obviously has (he admitted himself) a vested position on which way the software patent debate falls. I don't expect him to put the greater good over his personal profits. He'll probably try to claim otherwise, but his position is actually quite similar to the slave trade: His own personal interests and profits are more important than society's interests.

Everyone knows that patents will be used by the big and established companies to crush or suffocate the little, often by questionable patents. While there may be some small benefit for the little guy, this gain is more than offset by the power of a legal monopoly. Software patents are less about innovation and more of protectionism of the established players.

The fact that there is big debate in Europe is good news, for it shows that not everyone is blinded. Being in the US, I regret that innovation is flowing outside our borders since we here spent our money in lawsuits rather than innovating. Patents are used by big companies to set up patent oligopolies to lock out everyone else from the market.

I do not support the use of software patents anywhere, even when its used against the big players (like Eolas v. Microsoft). The marketplace is simply much better and more efficient and innovative without software patents.
There is protection for software, and that's copyright.
Posted by: Root User   Posted on: 12/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

EU patent legislation should be dropped altogether.  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
Considering...  rapson | 12/08/04
Only if..  Patrick Jones | 12/08/04
Not quite.  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
Unsupported assertion  vferrara | 12/08/04
Can you be sure what Microsoft will do?  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
Can you be sure what God will do tomorrow?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Easy but unwise comparison.  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
You mean...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Now hold on there!!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Be definition patents give you the monopoly  voska | 12/08/04
Hog wash...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Yes, good point about slavery and objectivity here...  Root User | 12/08/04
I'll show you why you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Root User, please come back for my appology.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
No apologizies needed, I didn't take offense.  Root User | 12/08/04
Are you daft?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Lawsuits are not needed..  Patrick Jones | 12/08/04
Don't need a patent to make threats.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
But ...  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
I think it is likely that it will be dropped ...  George Mitchell | 12/08/04
Naw, just a stall until the dust settles.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
They don't pay taxes  voska | 12/08/04
And who's fault is that?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Typical Microsoft lies.  systemcleaner | 12/08/04
Typical Zealot rant...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
The citizens don't count?  IT_User | 12/08/04
Typo?  George Mitchell | 12/09/04
The competitiveness council of the European Union  Squawkbox | 12/08/04
You might do well to get an idea of what it is  Squawkbox | 12/08/04
The Competitiveness Council of the U.S. FTC  IT_User | 12/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc