On TechRepublic: 10 biggest failures in IT history
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 32 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
... for those who can't afford to pay
What's open source but the ultimate in outsourcing/offshoring? Wages can't get any lower than $0, can they?!

You wrote:
I am absolutely amazed that someone would have hostility toward people doing what they enjoy doing as a hobby and attempting to contribute to the well being of society at the same time.

Tell you what.
Let's assume I do the same sort of job you do. I'll retire and tell your boss that I'll do your work for free. I enjoy the work, it'll make his company more able to compete, and I believe in the open source philosophy that no one should be paid for IT work. (That's exaggerated, but let it ride.)
Your boss is pleased with the offer, fires you immediately, and lets me start work.

Have I really upheld the proud old tradition that neighbors help each other put up barns? Or that, in towns that can't afford full time professionals, people offer to help put out neighbors' fires?
You're expanding the role of voluntarism beyond its appropriate meaning.


You also wrote:
The US right now is extremely unable to compete with the rest of the world. That is why jobs are going overseas in droves. And trying to fight free software will only make the situation worse.

First off, I agree with you about jobs going overseas. The economists had better be right about more advanced replacement jobs appearing, or the country will be sucking wind. Notice how the people-to-people jobs that are assured of remaining are also the least well paid?

But free software's role is not as you say.
The US may not be able to compete in the less sophisticated portable jobs, but supposedly the replacement jobs will be more innovative and complex. Software is, or can be, about as innovative and complex as you'd like.
So, a good number of the replacement jobs can be in software. Or rather, not. Because people with the training are doing the work for free. True, at the moment open source is nowhere near as advanced as the proprietary products. But companies are looking at simple solutions because they see IT as a cost center rather than profit contributor. And all that open source stuff is out there encouraging them.

The only good news is the spread of patents and the establishment of international enforcement mechanisms. Open source can't progress without violating patents; in fact, it's almost certainly in violation of a lot right now.
So, the motto should be, bring the jobs home: support patents.

There are lots of good economic reasons to oppose open source. This has been one of them.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 11/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Snowball... Avalanche..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 11/22/04
Snowball... Avalanche..  Loverock Davidson | 11/22/04
Alfred Chuang is incorrect  David Mohring | 11/22/04
Not only that but...  htotten | 11/22/04
Control of the solution Vs Ownership by vendors  David Mohring | 11/22/04
Open Source?  anthonycea | 11/22/04
Ballmer Says Use Open Source OS And You'll Get Sued!  itanalyst | 11/22/04
So do the analysts quoted in this article. (NT)  Anton Philidor | 11/22/04
So, MS is getting sued by Novell, and Novell ...  Judas I. | 11/22/04
Lest we forget  IT_User | 11/22/04
now that is funny (NT)  JasonL31 | 11/23/04
hahahahhahahaha  Fred Flintsone | 11/22/04
Linux fails.  rhammock | 11/22/04
Which two?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 11/23/04
Which two?  rhammock | 11/23/04
This, from a guy ...  Judas I. | 11/22/04
yabba dabba do!  d_jedi | 11/22/04
Hey, look  AmusedAtItAll | 11/22/04
Hey, look  Loverock Davidson | 11/22/04
Oh, I get it:  Judas I. | 11/23/04
Oh, I get it:  Loverock Davidson | 11/23/04
On the threshold of a new era ...  George Mitchell | 11/22/04
Dystopia  Anton Philidor | 11/22/04
Zero sum assumption  IT_User | 11/22/04
Please clarify.  Anton Philidor | 11/22/04
I'll give it a try  IT_User | 11/22/04
And some additional thoughts  DaveCollet | 11/22/04
Incremental improvements aren't enough  Anton Philidor | 11/23/04
What eludes you.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 11/23/04
IT: too easy for comfort.  Anton Philidor | 11/23/04
Free labor is an American tradition ...  George Mitchell | 11/23/04
... for those who can't afford to pay  Anton Philidor | 11/24/04
Anton, when you get fired  Spoon Jabber | 11/24/04
Re: IT: too easy for comfort.  nightshade0143 | 06/20/05
Don't hold your breath  seosamh_z | 11/22/04
I don't think you understand what "free" means.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 11/23/04
Context my man  seosamh_z | 11/23/04
Thanks for clarifying 'free'.  George Mitchell | 11/23/04
the world needs more like you - NOT  JasonL31 | 11/23/04
Excuse me?  George Mitchell | 11/23/04
"Good enough" software  Anton Philidor | 11/22/04
Yes, that niche is called "business"  IT_User | 11/22/04
Package vs people  Anton Philidor | 11/23/04
Unless you have unlimited funds...  John L. Ries | 11/22/04
Open source's next frontier  FilledOut | 11/22/04
Growing market for Linux  whisperycat | 11/23/04
Need some big fish to get on board...  gtdworak | 11/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here