On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 33:
Next »
« Previous
Cut off the Legal Expense
I can sympathise with Microsoft although on an infinitely smaller scale. I helped General Instrument into the early video game business as the sole software consultant. I had been referred to the gig by a salesman who was peddling paper to the firm. For six months he took 50% of my billings and then I struck out on my own with the firm. He sued the firm and they wanted me to bear the financial burden if I wanted the consulting contract. I sat all three lawyers in a room, (His, mine and the company's) and calmly listened to each outline an approach which would cost me a fortune in fees. I asked what they would settle for and within a nanosecond said "fine". You have never seen three more dissapointed faces in your life. Thank goodness General Instrument lent me the money and let me pay it back over years. The result was one of the three original video game families -- Intellivision.

The lesson both Microsoft and I learned is that a mediocre lawyer can bankrupt even a great techie so the rule is "whatever they ask for, give em". I wonder why technological innovation is crashing.

I also notice that New York State's top Attorney has effectively killed a large Insurance firm (Marsh and McLennon), caused 3000 layoffs and destroyed the state as a home for such companies because of a practice that everyone knew about for years.
Posted by: TomMariner   Posted on: 11/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

IP Offensive?  htotten | 11/09/04
Let The Games Begin  RobertoSalazar | 11/09/04
I wonder how Microsoft is going to fare against IBM..  Jeff Spicoli | 11/09/04
Are you an idiot?  John Zern | 11/09/04
No, not this time  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Still surprised MS doesn't forgo software issues  FilledOut | 11/09/04
No money in hardware...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
Rather obvious isn't it?? Well, that said, any atack would cause problems.  DonnieBoy | 11/09/04
Don't fool yourselves...  Tim Patterson | 11/09/04
There is a flaw to your theory....  htotten | 11/09/04
Microsoft is in more danger from Patents  voska | 11/09/04
I agree  lgmbackman | 11/11/04
"speculative blog entry"  Harvey Birdman | 11/09/04
Or does Microsoft's settlement fever...  Yen_z | 11/09/04
With DRM as a selling point...  Anton Philidor | 11/09/04
The Dangers of Software Patents  P. Douglas | 11/09/04
Of course you're right that patents protect...  Anton Philidor | 11/09/04
As well as us little guys....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/09/04
you own no company or patents  JasonL31 | 11/27/04
Over Cooked  Stephen Wheeler | 11/10/04
Longer Term Objectives  Stephen Wheeler | 11/09/04
Why not stop hypothesising and look at the reality  Richard Flude | 11/09/04
Real Money  Stephen Wheeler | 11/10/04
Cut off the Legal Expense  TomMariner | 11/09/04
No one is looking at the real downside of software patents.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/09/04
What have you done with the real No_Ax?  Monkey_MCSE | 11/09/04
Amen.  htotten | 11/10/04
I agree, except for one thing...  Patrick Jones | 11/10/04
Copyright of software is a fiools errand.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
uk patent office submission to EU.  hipparchus2000 | 11/16/04
A patent based "attack" can take many forms.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
same is true of linux  hipparchus2000 | 11/16/04
Is this the same No Ax?  Roger Ramjet | 11/17/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here