On CNET: Tech gifts for every budget
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 37:
Next »
« Previous
You shoulod do a little research before you respond!
This is related to the EU and has little to do with the US (which is even stated in the article, had you bothered to read it). The title of this article relates to an XML document format. From the first paragraph of this article:

Responding to a request from the European Union to improve data interoperability, Microsoft has committed in perpetuity to offering a royalty-free license of Office-related XML document formats.

See, no US DOJ stuff here! It may have some relation to US DoJ stuff in the future, but it ain't this! You are makingstuff up, as usual in your own deluded and misinformed way! Presented is a document from Microsoft (which you appear to want to deny) which disproves you and only makes you look ignorent, arrogent and/or stupid (pick as many as applicable). Note, even they state it is EU and not US!

This is from Microsoft (src: http://www.microsoft.com/office/xml/juneletter.mspx)

Microsoft Office System?EU's IDA Commission Recommends Open Document Formats

An Open Letter From Senior Director and XML Architect Jean Paoli

The European Union's Telematics Between Administrations Committee (TAC) Recommends Its Governments Use Open Document Formats Such as Those in the Microsoft Office System

As co-creator of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) XML 1.0 standard and as a longtime evangelist and ambassador of XML, I am tremendously pleased by the recent Valoris report issued by the European Union's (EU) Interchange of Data between Administrations (IDA) Commission. The report recommends the uptake of open document formats based on XML, encourages the use of standards and of custom-defined schemas, and identifies Microsoft WordML (the schema for Microsoft Office Word 2003) as an open document format that greatly improves the potential for interoperability of document processing. For more information about this report visit the TAC approval, conclusions, and recommendations page.

We at Microsoft and in the XML community believe that XML-based technologies will enable new and exciting eGovernment solutions, so it is gratifying to see a validation of this vision at the highest levels of government. With this report, there can no longer be any question that XML enhances data interoperability across heterogeneous systems and allows documents to be archived, restructured, aggregated and re-used in new and dynamic ways. The steps taken by the EU to analyze the current status of document formats in the industry and to endorse the vision for XML will have tremendous importance in helping make that vision a reality in the years ahead.

I am extremely satisfied by the support the IDA Commission's report offers our efforts to empower customers with the benefits of XML on the desktop. The report specifically cites the steps Microsoft has taken with the WordML format as greatly improving the potential for interoperability of document processing around the world and calls out Microsoft's support for custom-defined schemas as a key benefit for customers.

Although our work will certainly continue, we view the EU report as a validation of our investment in XML and our open, royalty-free approach. Microsoft announced the availability of the WordprocessingML format (also known as WordML) through a royalty-free licensing program shortly after the launch of the Microsoft Office System last October. Since that time, we have seen a tremendous response to this announcement from governments and from a broad set of customers that have accelerated plans for deployment of XML-based solutions based on the Microsoft Office 2003 Editions. We were honored and pleased to be invited by the EU to a meeting of the IDA earlier this year to discuss our work and the steps we have taken to develop an open document format.

I appreciate the Commission's drive to encourage the industry to provide filters that allow documents based on the WordML specifications to be read and written to other applications while maintaining a maximum degree of accuracy in content, structure and presentation. At Microsoft, we fully believe in the benefits of this, as demonstrated by our licensing program for the open and royalty-free Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas. This program specifically enables the developer community to build such filters to enable better interoperability across document formats. If it is not too bold, I would actually like to expand this call to action. We should not be limiting our thinking to word processing capabilities; I would like to see this concept extended to many more productivity-based scenarios that will bring data interoperability efficiencies to customers worldwide. This is the core foundation of the release of SpreadsheetML (for Microsoft Office Excel 2003), DataDiagramingML (for Microsoft Office Visio? 2003), WordprocessingML (for Microsoft Office Word 2003) and FormTemplate Schemas (for Microsoft Office InfoPath? 2003).

I also want to underline the EU's notation about Microsoft's deep support for custom-defined schemas as a key benefit for customers because it is a central part of our overall strategy. At Microsoft, we do not believe in a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Instead, as we have evolved Microsoft Office over many years, we have added support for more and more file formats to meet the growing needs of our customers. The support we have built into the Office 2003 Professional Editions for custom-defined schemas takes this concept to a new level. For the first time, Microsoft is able to offer customers a built-in infrastructure to support their own XML document schemas, allowing customers to combine the power of Microsoft Office 2003 with the infinite flexibility of custom-defined XML document support.

Behind this approach is a vision that many of us have shared?that if we could separate the content, or meaning, of a document from the presentation layer of that document, then users would be able to 'tag' and precisely identify parts of their document with labels that could have commonality of meaning that would allow use and reuse. In a government form, for instance, a creator could tag the name, address, sex, age, and other fields to allow the capture of information in a richer, more semantic and structured way. By making it possible for governments and businesses to capture that information, we're enabling the world to work with the data that is most relevant to the needed situation. This is the promise delivered by the support for custom-defined schema. We believe that the next few years will see an explosion of new solutions in which, for example, pharmacies, clinics, health organizations, and other medical organizations, will be able to fully leverage the open standard HL7 XML data structure to define the industry requirements. The Microsoft Office System provides a rich authoring, editing and workflow environment for this schema.

At Microsoft, we recognize that, in addition to in many ways validating our approach, the EU report also challenges us and others in the industry to think about how we can further clarify our position and think long term about our commitments to data interchange. We accept this challenge and look forward to working with the EU, representatives of its member states, other government policy-makers, and the industry as a whole in the months and years ahead. Personally, I am truly delighted that the vision for XML on the desktop is becoming a reality for the benefit for all.

C'est magnifique.

Sincerely,

Jean Paoli
Senior Director, XML Architecture
Microsoft Corporation

On October 12th, it was found that Microsft had stumbled on it's DoJ compliance (which is not related to this). That was reported in: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/44209/44209.html but that is a differnt matter, different economic block and different legal system!

From: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/44209/44209.html Microsoft Stumbles in US Antitrust Compliance October 12, 2004:

According to a report submitted this week to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Microsoft is behind schedule in its compliance with its US antitrust settlement. According to regulators from the US Department of Justice (DOJ), who authored the report, Microsoft has failed to meet certain requirements regarding the distribution of technical information to competitors and partners.

The report cites three problem areas. First, Microsoft is late. The company said that it would complete the documentation by third quarter 2004 but now says the documentation might be delayed until December. Second, the company plans to distribute the documentation in a non-editable .mht format that can only be read by Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE). And third, the report says that much of the documentation is inaccurate. The DOJ wants Microsoft to correct this situation within 60 days.

On its end, Microsoft says it has worked hard to meet the compliance requirements and defends its use of the .mht format as being secure and stable. The company says 19 organizations are now licensing the technical information that it was forced to supply.


In related news, Microsoft says it would still like to settle its European Union (EU) antitrust case, despite recent comments from EU Competition Commissioner Mario Monti, who ruled out such an outcome. "We definitely want to settle. We just said it in court, and I'll say it again," Jean-Philippe Courtois, CEO of Microsoft Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), said. "We agreed on a settlement initially, but the commission felt that it had to set a precedent. The [EU] sanctions set a worrisome precedent because they will affect companies' ability to innovate. At the core of the issue is innovation. We want to be able to innovate, to make a plan and to act on it."


So, basically, Microsoft was late on the DoJ settlement but was working hard to get the EU requirements met! You are confusing the cases (there are 2). This article is abot the European case, not the US case! They have not met the requirements for the US case and this does not do it, either!

It would appear that you are intimidated by Monti, which I find very amusing! It would also appear that you really are clueless when it comes to legal issues, as well as technical, business, international, etc. Maybe you should stick to watching the men's room on closed circuit TV (something you claimed you did in one of these talkbacks)!
Posted by: B.O.F.H.   Posted on: 11/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well..  vdraken | 11/05/04
Author needs to get his facts straight.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Author has them correct.  berck | 11/05/04
Interesting, and I think misleading.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Closed source plugins are common in the GPL world  George Mitchell | 11/06/04
Oh I agree, but being clear on it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
Microsoft is opening this to meet EU req's.  B.O.F.H. | 11/06/04
Actually no, it was part of the DOJ agreement.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
So accroding to No_Ax, Microsoft got it wrong?  B.O.F.H. | 11/06/04
What is NOT being said.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 11/05/04
It does not need to be included ...  George Mitchell | 11/06/04
True, open source can be another channel for MS  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
How much better  michael-t | 11/05/04
You wanna see miserable consumers...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
why are you so upset?  JasonL31 | 11/07/04
THANKS, MONTI  theo_durcan | 11/05/04
Monit boy had NOTHING to do with it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
This is to meet EU's IDA Commission, not DOJ.  B.O.F.H. | 11/06/04
Go back and read the DoJ settlement please.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
Take it up with Microsoft!  B.O.F.H. | 11/06/04
And Monti says...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/07/04
You shoulod do a little research before you respond!  B.O.F.H. | 11/07/04
Questions on the method.  Update victim | 11/05/04
Answers for ya.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/06/04
A million posts by NoAx again, and he gets it wrong every time  hipparchus2000 | 11/06/04
Hmmm, lets see how many ways you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/07/04
"whining to have it given to standards body" etc  hipparchus2000 | 11/07/04
now f they just stop bolting apps to the OS  JasonL31 | 11/07/04
Huh, everyone is HAPPY.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/07/04
You claim to be a consultant  IT_User | 11/07/04
By your request...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/08/04
no link then  hipparchus2000 | 11/08/04
then why are you so unhappy?  JasonL31 | 11/07/04
Me, I'm as happy as a pig in slip.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/08/04
A pig in a slip?  Spoon Jabber | 11/09/04
Not that you are using it anyways  FilledOut | 11/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here