Bruce may be right
Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
|
|
Asking for trouble
mobrien_12@... | 11/04/04
|
Depends
Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
|
Depends on license definition.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|
|
ZDNet, fix your links.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|
|
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it
hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
|
|
Solaris 2.x is a System V derivative
John L. Ries | 11/04/04
|
SysV, not BSD... but just vaguely
asky | 11/05/04
|
|
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it
hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
|
|
In the mean time...
Cardinal_Bill | 11/04/04
|
|
the answer to AnswerBook... is Google??
asky | 11/05/04
|
|
I am certain the issue is NOT allowing Solaris code into Linux.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|
|
will be out of their hands
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
|
Thank Gawd for patents and licenses.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
|
I agree..surely no one wants innovation or progress
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
|
Explain how COPYING is innovative at all?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
|
Do it now Sun
FilledOut | 11/05/04
|
|
Or else... What?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
|
Or else watch Solaris get eaten by linux...
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
|
Maybe, maybe not. Many more machines running Solaris than Linux.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
|
Maybe, maybe not.
richdave | 11/05/04
|
A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex. It's also more reliable. Standardize on a single Linux platform with SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, and get the world's most interoperable Linux
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
