On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it
I think Solaris came from a vendor standardisation initiative that included BSD/AIX etc, although I think it might have some ancestral System V in it.
The going open source could well be the deal that Sun did with SCO some months ago (some sort of perpetual deal). In any case, Solaris has been free to download in the past.
(free to download binaries mean there isn't a lot of SALEABLE value in the code).
Anyway good on Sun if they do this. Hope they use an existing open source licence and not make yet another one.
By the way, I'm adamant that the reason minix lost to (what I think is an inferior) linux is primarily the licence. Personally I think minix was, and is an amazing product, probably superior to early linux.

I don't think the famous argument between Andrew Tannenbaum and Linux Torvalds over OS architecture mattered a single bit. Personally I beleive that Torvalds won out because of the GPL.
Look at the most powerful software out there in open source: firefox, openoffice, KDE and so on. All GNU licences. The BSDs have moved on a bit now, but for a while they looked extremely antiqated compared to Linux. And I don't think there is any easy install version of BSD (apart from OSX of course).
To me this and more is undeniable proof that GPL software (over time) becomes the best software. The licence holds the power.

I'm far more likely to even bother to look at source code if it's GPL than any other licence.
Posted by: hipparchus2000   Posted on: 11/04/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Bruce may be right  Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
Asking for trouble  mobrien_12@... | 11/04/04
Depends  Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
Depends on license definition.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
ZDNet, fix your links.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it  hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
Solaris 2.x is a System V derivative  John L. Ries | 11/04/04
SysV, not BSD... but just vaguely  asky | 11/05/04
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it  hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
In the mean time...  Cardinal_Bill | 11/04/04
the answer to AnswerBook... is Google??  asky | 11/05/04
I am certain the issue is NOT allowing Solaris code into Linux.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
will be out of their hands  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Thank Gawd for patents and licenses.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
I agree..surely no one wants innovation or progress  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Explain how COPYING is innovative at all?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Do it now Sun  FilledOut | 11/05/04
Or else... What?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Or else watch Solaris get eaten by linux...  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Maybe, maybe not. Many more machines running Solaris than Linux.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Maybe, maybe not.  richdave | 11/05/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More