Bruce may be right
Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
|
Asking for trouble
mobrien_12@... | 11/04/04
|

Depends
Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
|

Depends on license definition.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|
ZDNet, fix your links.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it
hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
|

Solaris 2.x is a System V derivative
John L. Ries | 11/04/04
|
 
SysV, not BSD... but just vaguely
asky | 11/05/04
|
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it
hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
|
In the mean time...
Cardinal_Bill | 11/04/04
|

the answer to AnswerBook... is Google??
asky | 11/05/04
|
I am certain the issue is NOT allowing Solaris code into Linux.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
|

will be out of their hands
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
 
Thank Gawd for patents and licenses.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
  
I agree..surely no one wants innovation or progress
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
   
Explain how COPYING is innovative at all?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
Do it now Sun
FilledOut | 11/05/04
|

Or else... What?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
 
Or else watch Solaris get eaten by linux...
Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
|
  
Maybe, maybe not. Many more machines running Solaris than Linux.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
   
Maybe, maybe not.
richdave | 11/05/04
|