On GameSpot: Red Dead Redemption saddles up April 27
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
Depends
Sun purchased that FULL UNIX license from Novell in 1986(?). Do we really KNOW what it said? Of course calling it OpenSolaris avoids calling it "Unix".
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 11/04/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Bruce may be right  Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
Asking for trouble  mobrien_12@... | 11/04/04
Depends  Roger Ramjet | 11/04/04
Depends on license definition.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
ZDNet, fix your links.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it  hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
Solaris 2.x is a System V derivative  John L. Ries | 11/04/04
SysV, not BSD... but just vaguely  asky | 11/05/04
Solaris came from BSD and AIX too didn't it  hipparchus2000 | 11/04/04
In the mean time...  Cardinal_Bill | 11/04/04
the answer to AnswerBook... is Google??  asky | 11/05/04
I am certain the issue is NOT allowing Solaris code into Linux.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/04
will be out of their hands  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Thank Gawd for patents and licenses.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
I agree..surely no one wants innovation or progress  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Explain how COPYING is innovative at all?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Do it now Sun  FilledOut | 11/05/04
Or else... What?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Or else watch Solaris get eaten by linux...  Jeff Spicoli | 11/05/04
Maybe, maybe not. Many more machines running Solaris than Linux.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
Maybe, maybe not.  richdave | 11/05/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here