On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
What you said:
Does Microsoft have a per CPU license? Can't speak for things like SQL server but their OS is setup to run on a certain number of CPUs but they don't charge per CPU. For example, XP Pro will run on up to 2 CPUs, but there's no price difference between a single or dual CPU installation. Similarly, Windows Server 2003 Standard will run on 1,2 or 4 CPUs, same price. Enterprise Edition will use up to 8 and Datacenter up to 64. Again, one price for each. Now you could argue that the different editions are their way of charging for multiple CPUs but there are other differences in the editions as well.

The article is about server applications (BizTalk, SQL Server) of which you can't speak for. XP is desktop, only! Windows 2003 is just the host OS and not related to the context of the article. The pricing may change as you scale the CPU count (though slightly less with multicore) for server based application. This does not mean that the server OS will change in price! This is server applications, such that any desktop stuff (Windows XP, XP Pro) is not even aplicable.

I started off with XP as an example then also went into Windows 2003 server CPU limitations. If you want to run Windows 2003 Enterprise server on 1 CPU or 8 it's the same price.

Thse are OS's and not server based applications. This is not the same. Windows 2003 != SQL Server.

Now what I suspect the article was really clarifying is that Microsoft will treat an 8 CPU/16 core (assuming 2 cores per socket) as the same number of CPUs. But they don't actually charge more for their server software if you're running multiple CPUs.

Correct, it has to do with server applicion pricing, not the host OS! They are having to rethink their pricing for server application (but not the host OS).
Posted by: B.O.F.H.   Posted on: 10/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Dual core pricing and Debian  RR_man | 10/18/04
UserLinux, based on Debian, comming soon.  DonnieBoy | 10/19/04
Everyone that I know that uses Linux...  balsover | 10/20/04
re: Everyone that I know that uses Linux...  richdave | 10/20/04
They tried...  realitycheck101 | 10/18/04
Yes  Jeff Spicoli | 10/19/04
Are you clueless?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/04
Hyperthreading...  Physco Dude | 10/19/04
Not even close.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/04
Excuse me? Hyperthreading is similar to dual core -- I think not..  DigitalKid | 10/19/04
That's BS  george_ou | 10/19/04
Read the article before posting  GregSalts | 10/19/04
When I install OS x or App y on my Gnu 8 x CPU SMP server...  The King's Servant | 10/19/04
"Missed the point" is understatement  Fred Fredrickson | 10/19/04
"Miss understanding" is a stated point.  The King's Servant | 10/19/04
Microsoft Gouges  Kamikaze_Ohka | 10/19/04
And yet another clueless poster.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/04
Pay per CPU was around before Microsft started this.  B.O.F.H. | 10/19/04
Actually...  PA-ITGuy | 10/19/04
YOu may be confusing desktop with server pricing.  B.O.F.H. | 10/19/04
Did you read my post?  PA-ITGuy | 10/19/04
What you said:  B.O.F.H. | 10/19/04
Oops  PA-ITGuy | 10/19/04
Yep you are right PA-ITGuy  DigitalKid | 10/19/04
BOFH is right but you are right too in that,  The King's Servant | 10/19/04
Moot point, really  Fred Fredrickson | 10/19/04
I don't see why this should be too much of a surprise  Michael Kelly | 10/19/04
Another reason to use open source. This gets ridiculous.  DonnieBoy | 10/19/04
open source is ridiculous? Naw, it ain't that bad.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/04
It's not OS's it's APPS  htotten | 10/19/04
Interpretations change with Technology and so will Licenseing and Pricing.  webgecko | 10/19/04
Very well put but I have a question.  The King's Servant | 10/19/04
Again Interpretations will Vary  webgecko | 10/20/04
Excelent! Well thought out.  The King's Servant | 10/21/04
The Peace that passes all understanding is Obviously Yours  webgecko | 10/24/04
Religon & Forums  harryomary1@... | 02/08/05
You have a good point but I think you are over reacting  webgecko | 03/22/07
I am embarrassed for linux fans  NonZealot | 10/19/04
Can you be more specific in your references  The King's Servant | 10/19/04
How about these for starters  rapson | 10/20/04
it kills me that for a dual processor pc - you need to buy two licenses  V Sanders | 10/19/04
Great move for MS... Will IBM, HP, SUN, and other UNIX vendors follow suit?  Plain Logic | 10/19/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More