On CBS MoneyWatch: Who Does the Most College Drinking?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 40:
Next »
« Previous
But Windows IS the intextricable tie
It was argued that "But they are doing their age old proprietary lock-in scheme at a time when the industry is no longer inextricably tied to them and is no longer beholden to them."

I wish that were true. But almost all end user PCs that actually do anything use use Windows--mostly Windows 98 and earlier in many cases of average business and home use.

And .NET is starting to leave this huge base of PCs behind. For example, there are new utility upgrades from firms that have always been MS-cozy that now require .NET amd which do not run under Windows 98. When you buy the new version both the new version and a copy of the old version are provided, because from now on it's evidently XP only. So Windows 98 users get long horned sooner rather than later.

How can you not be forced into Longhorn under such circumstances? Don't be so naive.

I am sure it does not HAVE to be that way but I would suspect that the .NET developer tools aren't being built to compile with ease to Windows 98 in the way they surely complie with ease to XP.

MS did this with Windows 95 by simply dropping routine updates to installable components that developers ship with applications, such as certain database functionality, Direct-X etc.
Many of tehse components that go with one's app aren't installable in Windows 95 now and have not been for quite a while.

The same will soon happen re WIndows 98 I am sure.

We are completely tied to Windows and when MS says jump, as in sorry no more software for Windows 98, we shall all jump as ordered.
Posted by: KeithRisler   Posted on: 11/20/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

.NET = microchannel?  IT_User | 11/20/03
Well said  Arrg | 11/20/03
You said it exactly  GRindinAxTaRupy | 11/20/03
But Windows IS the intextricable tie  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
Re-complexifying the client.  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
It isn't computing power  IT_User | 11/20/03
Deployment and support.  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
Java...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Interesting, but there is more  IT_User | 11/20/03
.NET, "hailstorm" et al -- the names are hints  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
Client recomplexity...  rthorat@... | 11/20/03
Microsoft wasn't the only company to figure this out..  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
.NET = microchannel?  Chris Moller | 11/20/03
.NET vs Java the platform  epaval@... | 11/20/03
Ummm, Ya...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Bank One in Chicago  EricMarts@... | 11/20/03
CRM Software  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
NET = microchannel?  lmaxwell | 11/20/03
Potential patent problems reduce your argument to irrelevancy.  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
Bottom line...  Jomo_z | 11/20/03
And Previously the Real Zeal was [MS]"Java"  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
I would still say  lmaxwell | 11/20/03
Despite being a .NET developer  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
Aren't you glad no one ever has had to...  Chris Moller | 11/20/03
No, they are *not* Bagels..  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
The two are made so differntly too  voska | 11/20/03
Dunkin Donuts  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
You used to bake donuts?  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/20/03
Wheres the goal?  OhMyGosh | 11/20/03
.net What's that???  psychjoe | 11/20/03
.net "strategy"  michael-t | 11/20/03
So M$'s "elusive strategy" has to be "re-explained..." WHY?  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
Truly witty post! The LockNet monster lives!  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
So M$'s "elusive strategy" has to be "re-explained...  bgoss@... | 11/20/03
paint the preeetty pictures  juicie | 11/20/03
Java is so "bad"!  michael-t | 11/20/03
I Like Java But...  RoyTyrellFl | 11/20/03
So you ARE saying M$ malware IS way too expensive and problematic  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
I agree...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Really, this is just a way to lock you in.  DonnieBoy | 11/20/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here