On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 40:
Next »
« Previous
Well said
Damn, I wish I could write as well as you do. You've always shown yourself to be open minded and intelligent. I try my best to put my admitted mistrust of MS aside when making a judgment, but it can be difficult. In saying that I honestly believe the very problem with .NET and most of MS's ideas is that they are made with "what is best for their wallet" not what is best for the industry. This problem will crop up in any company because that is what they exist for. I have no solution past saying open source is a little safer because it's not so "wallet driven". I think we need to stop and consider this when making any decisions concerning a new technology. Why was it created, will it help my bottom line, or is it just another salesman's smoke screen.

Another related force I have found difficult to deal with is the non-tech person in a higher position. I recently had a higher up request and get office XP for the simple reason of it being new. In the end it provided nothing new for him, he has become more difficult to support and it's taking him time to learn the changes they made. In the end the new technology reduced our productivity as a group and even did some damage to his, due to learning.
Posted by: Arrg   Posted on: 11/20/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

.NET = microchannel?  IT_User | 11/20/03
Well said  Arrg | 11/20/03
You said it exactly  GRindinAxTaRupy | 11/20/03
But Windows IS the intextricable tie  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
Re-complexifying the client.  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
It isn't computing power  IT_User | 11/20/03
Deployment and support.  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
Java...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Interesting, but there is more  IT_User | 11/20/03
.NET, "hailstorm" et al -- the names are hints  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
Client recomplexity...  rthorat@... | 11/20/03
Microsoft wasn't the only company to figure this out..  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
.NET = microchannel?  Chris Moller | 11/20/03
.NET vs Java the platform  epaval@... | 11/20/03
Ummm, Ya...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Bank One in Chicago  EricMarts@... | 11/20/03
CRM Software  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
NET = microchannel?  lmaxwell | 11/20/03
Potential patent problems reduce your argument to irrelevancy.  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
Bottom line...  Jomo_z | 11/20/03
And Previously the Real Zeal was [MS]"Java"  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
I would still say  lmaxwell | 11/20/03
Despite being a .NET developer  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
Aren't you glad no one ever has had to...  Chris Moller | 11/20/03
No, they are *not* Bagels..  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
The two are made so differntly too  voska | 11/20/03
Dunkin Donuts  Delaware Boy | 11/20/03
You used to bake donuts?  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/20/03
Wheres the goal?  OhMyGosh | 11/20/03
.net What's that???  psychjoe | 11/20/03
.net "strategy"  michael-t | 11/20/03
So M$'s "elusive strategy" has to be "re-explained..." WHY?  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
Truly witty post! The LockNet monster lives!  KeithRisler | 11/20/03
So M$'s "elusive strategy" has to be "re-explained...  bgoss@... | 11/20/03
paint the preeetty pictures  juicie | 11/20/03
Java is so "bad"!  michael-t | 11/20/03
I Like Java But...  RoyTyrellFl | 11/20/03
So you ARE saying M$ malware IS way too expensive and problematic  dicktaurus@... | 11/20/03
I agree...  prime21 | 11/20/03
Really, this is just a way to lock you in.  DonnieBoy | 11/20/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here