On mySimon: Norelco 6940 Shaver
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 14:
Next »
« Previous
It is after all about the consumer.
Joe Average consumer must first install this software and grant permission for it to be used. That has little or nothing to do with the litigants and that is what the judge seen.

One could almost liken it to a personal search engine that allows consumers to see alternative options and I fail to see how having options presented is a bad thing.
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 11/20/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Pop Up Purveyors should be treated as Signal Interferance  TreborG2 | 11/20/03
You make some interesting points but...  voska | 11/20/03
Not really  rpmyers1 | 11/20/03
Bundled with an app.. only acknowledged in the EULA..  d_jedi | 11/20/03
Fry 'em  rpmyers1 | 11/20/03
Yet another...  BitTwiddler | 11/20/03
The Judge made the right decision here  voska | 11/20/03
Not so sure ...  ac2_z | 11/20/03
What really bugs me is..  d_jedi | 11/20/03
The answer is simple...  BitTwiddler | 11/20/03
It is after all about the consumer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/20/03
SPAM supporting judge  Update victim | 11/20/03
I wonder if...  cchenoweth | 11/20/03
when businesses  lmaxwell | 11/20/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here