On TV.com: HEROES Actor Switching to Comedy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 14:
Next »
« Previous
Not really
If the software was agreed to, and the user knows it's there, I have no issues with this.

Signal interference doesn't apply at all.

HTML makes no guarantees about appearance on the client

Let me say it again

HTML makes no guarantees about appearance on the client

You want something absolutely, positively presented in your way? Write your own program to do it, don't ship it to a browser. The client is completely and utterly free to render any page in any desired mechanism, it's stated as such in the standard. Everything is just a hint for presenting the content.

Now, if the software was installed clandestinely, that's a different issue. Hit the group that installed it with hacking charges.
Posted by: rpmyers1   Posted on: 11/20/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Pop Up Purveyors should be treated as Signal Interferance  TreborG2 | 11/20/03
You make some interesting points but...  voska | 11/20/03
Not really  rpmyers1 | 11/20/03
Bundled with an app.. only acknowledged in the EULA..  d_jedi | 11/20/03
Fry 'em  rpmyers1 | 11/20/03
Yet another...  BitTwiddler | 11/20/03
The Judge made the right decision here  voska | 11/20/03
Not so sure ...  ac2_z | 11/20/03
What really bugs me is..  d_jedi | 11/20/03
The answer is simple...  BitTwiddler | 11/20/03
It is after all about the consumer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/20/03
SPAM supporting judge  Update victim | 11/20/03
I wonder if...  cchenoweth | 11/20/03
when businesses  lmaxwell | 11/20/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here