FAT patent
crocd | 09/30/04
|

Removing a patent is a long drawn out process.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
Who's trying to remove a patent?
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
  
Look at the article header
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
   
All patents are granted...
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
   
I forgot to add...
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
    
Yes, you missed a lot..
d_jedi | 09/30/04
|
     
But didn't Microsoft just apply for a patent...
voska | 09/30/04
|
     
It's up to the Director
IT_User | 09/30/04
|
     
No, only Micoresoft can appeal.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
Well, actually rule
IT_User | 09/30/04
|
     
Re: But didn't Microsoft just apply for a patent... (fix the f*ing forums!)
d_jedi | 10/01/04
|
 
Are they removing the patent ..
crocd | 09/30/04
|
  
Correct, and that IS a VERY long process.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
   
incorrect
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
    
Not appealing, in the formal sense
IT_User | 09/30/04
|
    
Please do yourself a favor and read the law.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
This is a public policy question
John L. Ries | 09/30/04
|
 
However...
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
  
True enough, however...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
   
Not true in this case...
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
    
Without a patent
IT_User | 09/30/04
|
    
Again, read the law on the matter.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
and OFC neither do yours NAG
Always Annoyed | 10/01/04
|

Even more ridiculous patents have been justifed by some
wresnick | 10/01/04
|
MS will have to let this one go, or face Eolas again
FilledOut | 09/30/04
|

Eolas hasn't "let it go".
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
And because they won't let it go...
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
  
That may be, however...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
Microsoft is appealing, no Eolas
Physco Dude | 09/30/04
|
  
Mixing up the meaning of "appeal"
IT_User | 09/30/04
|
Bring it on MS, all your patents will be voided!
Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/30/04
|

Patent office must have gotten your letters
FilledOut | 09/30/04
|

Bring it on IBM, all your patents will be voided!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
Actually, Ax...
Yen_z | 09/30/04
|
 
IBM has many hardware patents that will be unaffected (NT)
Update victim | 10/01/04
|
When, oh WHEN will ZDNet stop repeating falsehoods
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|

I believe they are talking about Samba running on Windows.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
Samba runs on Windows?
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
  
I should have said, a Windows enviornment.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
   
No, that's not an issue.
mobrien_12@... | 09/30/04
|
    
Really? Lets examine that a bit.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
You really don't have a clue about this, do you?
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
     
You failed to answer either question. Why?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
3 things
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
     
The Samba guys are 'scared' because ...
George Mitchell | 09/30/04
|
     
Ok No_Ax, some answers (simplified just for you!)
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
     
Scared...
Patrick Jones | 09/30/04
|
     
Mounting the Drive
John L. Ries | 09/30/04
|
     
Ok I'm going to try to explain this.
mobrien_12@... | 09/30/04
|
     
no-ax question back to you
V Sanders | 10/01/04
|
     
You are so clueless, bitty
AmusedAtItAll | 10/01/04
|
   
The panent would have no bearing in such a case
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
   
You lack the knowledge here
voska | 09/30/04
|
    
Read my above reply. (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
Like I said, you're in over your head
voska | 10/01/04
|
   
You really don't understand whayt SaMBa does, do you?
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
 
Samba implments SMB on Unix based systems!
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
If the patent is held up...
BitTwiddler | 09/30/04
|

And effects 95% of users how?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
Maybe not initially
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
  
You mean like IE?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
   
IE is going downhill..
d_jedi | 09/30/04
|
    
Stagnant, yes.
Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
|
     
OK, you got me..
d_jedi | 10/01/04
|
     
Free surfer link
Anton Philidor | 10/01/04
|
    
Um, not by any reports I've read.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
     
We read different reports (nt)
CobraA1 | 10/01/04
|
     
So you're saying IE's market share is increasing?
d_jedi | 10/01/04
|
   
Firefox is slowly making inroads
Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
|
    
Change "slowly" to "invisibly" (NT)
Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
|
    
Not yet
IT_User | 09/30/04
|

Thee already are
PA-ITGuy | 09/30/04
|
 
Not a problem at all ..
George Mitchell | 09/30/04
|
  
I said "without having to install any special software"
PA-ITGuy | 10/01/04
|
'Patent quality'?! Yo Microsoft, try PRODUCT quality
HypnoToad | 09/30/04
|
This is good
CobraA1 | 09/30/04
|
One of four previously issued FAT patents now in question.
Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
|

re previously granted to Microsoft for a Windows file format.
V Sanders | 09/30/04
|

Welcome back, Anton the Microsoft perpetual cheerleader!
systemcleaner | 10/01/04
|
Mixing up the meaning of "appeal"
IT_User | 09/30/04
|

Thank you, these folks seem to be without a clue on the process.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
Isn't it a little late to be patenting FAT?
John L. Ries | 09/30/04
|

Sigh,,, they have had the patents for years.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
 
How recently were they granted?
John L. Ries | 09/30/04
|
  
Now having read the decision...
John L. Ries | 09/30/04
|

FAT is used in SD and Flash media.
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
 
They are not "doing" the patent, it's been in place.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
|
  
This particular patent (5,579,517) has 'been in place' since 1995
George Mitchell | 09/30/04
|
   
Thanx for the info
voska | 10/01/04
|
  
learn to read!
B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
|
ms fighting this just makes them look bad
V Sanders | 09/30/04
|

Microsoft is and was always a self-serving monopoly.
systemcleaner | 10/01/04
|

Most companies who believe they can either
FilledOut | 10/01/04
|
Patenting the uninnovative
michael-t | 09/30/04
|
The pertinant facts:
George Mitchell | 09/30/04
|
Another Republican election ploy?
systemcleaner | 10/01/04
|

No
CobraA1 | 10/01/04
|
FAT patent - what arrogance
tony@... | 10/01/04
|
Ban Patents
IT_Critic | 10/01/04
|
Samba uses a network protocol, not a file format
balsover | 10/01/04
|