On TechRepublic: Use holiday parties to climb the ladder
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 39 of 101:
Next »
« Previous
Samba runs on Windows?
Since when? And why would it even NEED to be on Windows, when Samba is meant to be a clone of Window's own implementation of the SMB protocol? Why would you pay for something then disable it only to use a clone that does the same exact thing that the thing you disabled does?

Windows has SMB built in. UNIX/Linux/BSD does not. That's why UNIX/Linux/BSD needs Samba and Windows does not.
Posted by: Michael Kelly   Posted on: 09/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

FAT patent  crocd | 09/30/04
Removing a patent is a long drawn out process.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Who's trying to remove a patent?  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
Look at the article header  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
All patents are granted...  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
I forgot to add...  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
Yes, you missed a lot..  d_jedi | 09/30/04
But didn't Microsoft just apply for a patent...  voska | 09/30/04
It's up to the Director  IT_User | 09/30/04
No, only Micoresoft can appeal.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Well, actually rule  IT_User | 09/30/04
Re: But didn't Microsoft just apply for a patent... (fix the f*ing forums!)  d_jedi | 10/01/04
Are they removing the patent ..  crocd | 09/30/04
Correct, and that IS a VERY long process.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
incorrect  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
Not appealing, in the formal sense  IT_User | 09/30/04
Please do yourself a favor and read the law.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
This is a public policy question  John L. Ries | 09/30/04
However...  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
True enough, however...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Not true in this case...  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
Without a patent  IT_User | 09/30/04
Again, read the law on the matter.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
and OFC neither do yours NAG  Always Annoyed | 10/01/04
Even more ridiculous patents have been justifed by some  wresnick | 10/01/04
MS will have to let this one go, or face Eolas again  FilledOut | 09/30/04
Eolas hasn't "let it go".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
And because they won't let it go...  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
That may be, however...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Microsoft is appealing, no Eolas  Physco Dude | 09/30/04
Mixing up the meaning of "appeal"  IT_User | 09/30/04
Bring it on MS, all your patents will be voided!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/30/04
Patent office must have gotten your letters  FilledOut | 09/30/04
Bring it on IBM, all your patents will be voided!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Actually, Ax...  Yen_z | 09/30/04
IBM has many hardware patents that will be unaffected (NT)  Update victim | 10/01/04
When, oh WHEN will ZDNet stop repeating falsehoods  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
I believe they are talking about Samba running on Windows.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Samba runs on Windows?  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
I should have said, a Windows enviornment.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
No, that's not an issue.  mobrien_12@... | 09/30/04
Really? Lets examine that a bit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
You really don't have a clue about this, do you?  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
You failed to answer either question. Why?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
3 things  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
The Samba guys are 'scared' because ...  George Mitchell | 09/30/04
Ok No_Ax, some answers (simplified just for you!)  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
Scared...  Patrick Jones | 09/30/04
Mounting the Drive  John L. Ries | 09/30/04
Ok I'm going to try to explain this.  mobrien_12@... | 09/30/04
no-ax question back to you  V Sanders | 10/01/04
You are so clueless, bitty  AmusedAtItAll | 10/01/04
The panent would have no bearing in such a case  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
You lack the knowledge here  voska | 09/30/04
Read my above reply. (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Like I said, you're in over your head  voska | 10/01/04
You really don't understand whayt SaMBa does, do you?  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
Samba implments SMB on Unix based systems!  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
If the patent is held up...  BitTwiddler | 09/30/04
And effects 95% of users how?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Maybe not initially  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
You mean like IE?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
IE is going downhill..  d_jedi | 09/30/04
Stagnant, yes.  Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
OK, you got me..  d_jedi | 10/01/04
Free surfer link  Anton Philidor | 10/01/04
Um, not by any reports I've read.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
We read different reports (nt)  CobraA1 | 10/01/04
So you're saying IE's market share is increasing?  d_jedi | 10/01/04
Firefox is slowly making inroads  Michael Kelly | 09/30/04
Change "slowly" to "invisibly" (NT)  Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
Not yet  IT_User | 09/30/04
Thee already are  PA-ITGuy | 09/30/04
Not a problem at all ..  George Mitchell | 09/30/04
I said "without having to install any special software"  PA-ITGuy | 10/01/04
'Patent quality'?! Yo Microsoft, try PRODUCT quality  HypnoToad | 09/30/04
This is good  CobraA1 | 09/30/04
One of four previously issued FAT patents now in question.  Anton Philidor | 09/30/04
re previously granted to Microsoft for a Windows file format.  V Sanders | 09/30/04
Welcome back, Anton the Microsoft perpetual cheerleader!  systemcleaner | 10/01/04
Mixing up the meaning of "appeal"  IT_User | 09/30/04
Thank you, these folks seem to be without a clue on the process.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
Isn't it a little late to be patenting FAT?  John L. Ries | 09/30/04
Sigh,,, they have had the patents for years.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
How recently were they granted?  John L. Ries | 09/30/04
Now having read the decision...  John L. Ries | 09/30/04
FAT is used in SD and Flash media.  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
They are not "doing" the patent, it's been in place.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/30/04
This particular patent (5,579,517) has 'been in place' since 1995  George Mitchell | 09/30/04
Thanx for the info  voska | 10/01/04
learn to read!  B.O.F.H. | 09/30/04
ms fighting this just makes them look bad  V Sanders | 09/30/04
Microsoft is and was always a self-serving monopoly.  systemcleaner | 10/01/04
Most companies who believe they can either  FilledOut | 10/01/04
Patenting the uninnovative  michael-t | 09/30/04
The pertinant facts:  George Mitchell | 09/30/04
Another Republican election ploy?  systemcleaner | 10/01/04
No  CobraA1 | 10/01/04
FAT patent - what arrogance  tony@... | 10/01/04
Ban Patents  IT_Critic | 10/01/04
Samba uses a network protocol, not a file format  balsover | 10/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here